"Mu'awiah died on a religion other than Islam" - Imam Hanbal

(Below is the article by Raees Mustafa, which can be downloaded from the originally posted place at Scribd here)

Mu'awiah's hate for Ali

Article By: Raees Mustafa

Introduction

Assalmu Alaykum

My aim isn't to disrespect others' religion, and expose them, only without a disgusting approach and a filthy method. It's commonly known that really, we shouldn't even disrespect someone's false God, as he may in return disrespect our true God. And in this same case, I start with unity and peace, to be invited into a debate, and see who's on the true path, and who's on the false.

The article looks to cover the deep consideration of the huge misconception of Mu'awiah, being a great personality, and also signifies the proof, of how Mu'awiah, cursed Imam Ali (as), at various points of his life, we examine how Saa'ad bn Abi Waqqas was said to curse, but refused, and replied in a manner of anger, to indicate his bond of love for Ali, in such a sense, that he (Ali) doesn't deserve to be cursed! At all...

I hope you like the article, it's taken me 'some' time to write it, and I also hope the time waited is worth the read. Beneficiary only begins with the name of Almighty Allah... Without further a do, let's read;

Some chapters coming ahead;

1 – References about the incident of 'curse'

2 – Ibn Taymiyyah's mentioning

3 – Validity and authenticity of narrations

4 – Mu'awiah and the Banu Ummayah are Nawasib

5 – Defining a Nawasib

6 – Concluding most of the article

References about the incident of 'curse'

Saheeh Sunan Al-Nasa'i – Investigated by AlBani Vol. 2, p 343, Hadith No. 3006, it states:

“It's a narration from Sa'eed Ibn Jubair, who said: I was with Ibn Abbas at Arafa't, when he said: Why don't I hear people reciting Talbiyyah? I replied: Because of the fear of Mu'awiah...

Sa'eed has replied to Ibn Abbas, that people aren't reciting the Talbiyyah, because of Mu'awiah, his position and his punishment.

The narration from Sa'eed further continues;

“...Ibn Abbas got out of his tent and cried: Labyak – Allah Hum-Ma Labayk, Labyak – Allah Hum-Ma Labayk, they have left the Sunnah in the hatred of Ali”

Amazing, it's the Sunnah, as a Saheeh mentioned person reports, that reciting the Talbiyyah is Sunnah, but because of the fact that Ali done this Sunnah, Mu'awiah ordered not to go along with it! What hate from Mu'awiah, to Ali, just because he (Ali) fulfilled the Sunnah of the Prophet, Mu'awiah bans people from reciting something what Ali did, as Sunnah. Ali done it so we have to leave it!

The second narration is found in Al-Ta'leeqat Al-Salafiyyah Alaa Sunan Al-Nasa'i, authored by Abi Tayyib Al-Fujyaani, authenticated and commented on by Ahmed Shaghib and Ahmed Mujtaba Al-Salafi – The book is famous in the Salafi Library of Pakistan, Vol. 3, p 466, the book states:

“It's a narration from Sa'eed ibn Jubair, who said: I was with Ibn Abbas at Arafa't, when he (Ibn Abbas) said: Why don't Ihear people reciting the Talbiyyah? I replied: Due to the fear of Mu'awiah...

Another book, another famous book, with a famous author, from the famous Sunni sect says clearly the first part of the narration from Sa'eed Ibn Jubair, that because of Mu'awiah, we aren't reciting the Talbiyyah, as Ali did this, and if Ali did this, we don't want a Sunnah of such type performed in our practises, which Ali did too! Amazing, this is what so far, 2 references, have said, but let's be clarified and see what the whole narration says from Sa'eed Ibn Jubair located in Al-Ta'leeqat Al-Salafiyyah;

“...Ibn Abbas after hearing went out of the tent, and said: Labyak – Allah Hum-Ma Labayk, Labyak – Allah Hum-Ma Labayk, They have left the Sunnah in the hatred of Ali!”

The footnote is a mirror reflection of the narration given in Sunan Al-Nasa'i, it says the hadith has all the main aspects correct and Saheeh – Authentic!

So it's authentic, that just because Ali performed the Talbiyyah, Mu'awiah orders his people not to recite it too...

The third evidence is recorded by Imam Abi Bakr Ahmed Ibn Al-Hussain Ibn Ali Al-Bayhaqqi, in his famed book Sunan Al-Kubra (458. AH). Organised and commented by Islam Mansoor Abdul Hameed, Al-Hadith institution. This particular book published from Al-Hadith institution was printed in 1429. AH. In Vol. 5, p 274, Hadith No. 9447, it is written:

“Abul Hassan Muhammed Ibn Al-Hussein and Maisara were informed by the wordings of Sa'eed Ibn Jubair who said: I was with Ibn Abbas at the day or Arafa't, Ibn Abbas then said: Why don't I hear people reciting the Talbiyyah? I answered: due to the fear of Mu'awiah.

Ibn Abbas after hearing this exited the tent, and said: Labyak – Allah Hum-Ma Labayk, Labyak – Allah Hum-Ma Labayk against the will of Mu'awiah, O Allah curse these people, who have left the Sunnah in the hatred of Ali!”

This narration contains other people narrating it from others, but all of them turn out to be reliable, thiqah, as the book states. Though from our produced references, these are huge Sunni books, and Sunan Al-Nasa'i as mentioned, an even greater book, recognises this event, this narration primarily from Sa'eed Ibn Jubair as Saheeh – authentic!

Wow, what a companion of Prophet (saws), remind me of what Prophet (saws) said about Ali's Bughz (hate)? Prophet Muhamed (saws) said an ahadith, located in Sahih Muslim, Mostadrak Al-Hakim, Tareekh-e-Tabri and many other Shia and Sunni books. Molla Ali Qari has authenticated this hadith in his book called Sharha Fiqh Akbar respectively. Hadith:

So after examining the event from the holy verses of Rasool-ul-Allah, do we not witness the signs of infidelity in Mu'awiah's Eiman? And if Shia's are called Kafir, then so should be the Nawasib, and Mu'awiah's Shias, whom embrace their religion upon the pillars of love for Mu'awiah, and hate for Ali! Where is the logic? Where is the Sunnah? Where is the true Din – Religion?

In Vol. 4 of the book Saheeh Muslim, investigated by Shaikh Muslim ibn Mahmood Uthmaan Al-Salafi al-Athari. Publsihed from Al-Khair Institution, states on p 213:

The narration is fairly long - “From Amir bin Saa'ad Abi Waqqas, related from his father, who said: Mu'awiah ibn Abi Sufyan ordered Saa'ad to curse Imam Ali (as). On behalf Saa'ad rejected, and Mu'awiah asked: What stops you fro cursing Ali? Saa'ad replied: It's because of 3 things which Prophet Muhammed (saws) said about him which prevent me from cursing Ali Ibn Abi Talib (as), and even if I had 1 of these 3 things appointed upon me, in my command and possession, it would've been more dearer than having a red camel. I heard Prophet Muhammed (saws) say when Ali was left behind in a campaign with women and children: Aren't you satisfied O Ali that your relation to me is of Harun (as) to Moosa? Except that there is no Prophet after me. And also heard the Prophet (saws) say on the day of Khaybar: I will give the Standard Banner to the one who loves Allah and his Messenger and they (Allah and Messenger) love him too! Though everyone else was anxiously waiting to get the banner, when Prophet (saws) called Ali! Ali was called, his eyes were inflamed. Prophet (saws) then applied some of his saliva upon his eyes, and handed the Standard banner to him, and Allah soon gave hi victory. When this verse was revealed;

فَمَنْ حَآجَّكَ فِيهِ مِن بَعْدِ مَا جَاءكَ مِنَ الْعِلْمِ فَقُلْ تَعَالَوْاْ نَدْعُ أَبْنَاءنَا وَأَبْنَاءكُمْ وَنِسَاءنَا وَنِسَاءكُمْ وَأَنفُسَنَا وأَنفُسَكُمْ ثُمَّ نَبْتَهِلْ فَنَجْعَل لَّعْنَةُ اللّهِ عَلَى الْكَاذِبِينَ

003:061 Khan	:	Then whoever disputes with you concerning him ['Iesa (Jesus)] after (all this) knowledge that has come to you, [i.e. 'Iesa (Jesus)] being a slave of Allah, and having no share in Divinity) say: (O Muhammad SAW) "Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves - then we pray and invoke (sincerely) the Curse of Allah upon those who lie."
003:061 Maulana	:	Whoever then disputes with thee in this matter after the knowledge that has come to thee, say: Come! Let us call our sons and your sons and our women and your women and our people and your people, then let us be earnest in prayer, and invoke the curse of Allah on the liars.
003:061 Pickthal	:	And whoso disputeth with thee concerning him, after the knowledge which hath come unto thee, say (unto him): Come! We will summon our sons and your sons, and our women and your women, and ourselves and yourselves, then we will pray humbly (to our Lord) and (solemnly) invoke the curse of Allah upon those who lie.
003:061 Rashad	:	If anyone argues with you, despite the knowledge you have received, then say, "Let us summon our children and your children, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves, then let us invoke GOD's curse upon the liars."
003:061 Sarwar	:	If anyone disputes (your prophesy) after knowledge has come to you, say, "Let each of us bring our children, women, our people, and ourselves to one place and pray to God to condemn the liars among us."
003:061 Shakir	:	But whoever disputes with you in this matter after what has come to you of knowledge, then say: Come let us call our sons and your sons and our women and your women and our near people and your near people, then let us be earnest in prayer, and pray for the curse of Allah on the liars.
003:061 Sherali	:	Now whoso disputes with thee concerning him, after what has come to thee of Knowledge, say to him 'Come, let us call our sons and your sons, and our women and your women, and our people and your people; then let us pray fervently and invoke the curse of ALLAH on those who lie.
003:061 Yusufali	:	If any one disputes in this matter with thee, now after (full) knowledge Hath come to thee, say: "Come! let us gather together,- our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves: Then let us earnestly pray, and invoke the curse of Allah on those who lie!"

Allah's messenger called Ali, Fatima, Hassan and Hussain. And the Prophet proclaimed: O Allah, these are my AhlulBayt!”

Now let us simplify the narration in steps to just exactly see what is the discussion going on between these 2 men, Saa'ad and Mu'awiah. These steps may help you to witness what's happening:

1. Mu'awiah and Saa'ad are having a discussion.
2. Mu'awiah orders Saa'ad to curse Imam Ali (as).
3. However Saa'ad rejects the blasphemous order from Mu'awiah.
4. Mu'awiah asks him why he doesn't curse and swear upon Ali?
5. To that Saa'ad replies the words which have been coloured, these contain mostly ahadith and events related to Ali's magnificence, and then at the end, Saa'ad concludes upon that proof, and those ahadith from Prophet about the love of Ali, not to curse upon him.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Can you 'actually' handle the truth?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

And there was another proof, from one of the strongest pupil in the history of ahadith, narrating, why he rejected cursing Ali, and how Mu'awiah, ordered him to...

Ibn Taymiyyah's mentioning

In the famed book Minhaj Al-Sunnah Al-Nabawiyyah, this book is incredibly well known in Saudi Arabia, as this is written by the heads of all the nawasib, Ibn Taymiyyah. Investigated by Dr. Muhammed Rashad Salim. In this book written by Ibn Taymiyyah, he addresses publicly and clearly, in Vol. 5, p 42 that Mu'awiah ibn Sufyan, ordered Saa'ad to curse Ali. Pay sincere attention dear viewers, this is probably, the greatest proof of all! On page 42 of Vol. 5 in the book Minhaj Al-Sunnah Al-Nabawiyyah, Ibn Taymiyyah writes:

“As for the narration of Mu'awiah ordering Saa'ad to curse Ali, Saa'ad refsed to do so. Mu'awiah then asked Saa'ad, from what prevents him to curse Ali ibn Abi Talib? Sa'aad replied: It's because of 3 things which Prophet Muhammed (saws) told us about Ali. That though those 3 things, I will not curse Ali! And even if I had 1 of these 3 things appointed upon me, in my command and possession, it would've been more dearer than having a red camel...”

Amazing, the greatest Nasibi, admitts the fact that:

• Saa'ad was ordered to curse Ali by Mu'awiah
• Saa'ad refused and refused upon 3 relations of Ali to Prophet (saws), which he said at various points.

The event narrated in Minhaj Al-Sunnah by Ibn Taymiyyah, regards to this talk between Saa'ad and Mu'awiah, he writes in the footnote: Saheeh – Authentic, narrated by Sahih Muslim, which contains Ali's 3 mentioned virtuous which Rasool-ul-Allah said.

May Allah guide us all, and protect us from his enemies, and guide us on the path of Mustaqeem and Mukhlasin. Though there is one thing here which really deserves light. If the Prophet said 3 virtuous about Ali, located in Sahih Muslim, and also in his (Ibn Taymiyyah's) own book – Minhaj Al-Sunnah, then who is Mu'awiah, to give an order, to Saa'ad, to curse Ali?

Ibn Taymiyyah openly owns and admitts the fact that he is a Nasibi, and has no respect for Ali, as that is the part of their faith. Though hold on, if we examine the above hadith, of Prophet Muhammed (saws) saying Ali's hate is Kufr, then that Mu'awiah, is a Kafir! Not according to me, but according to the logic of the wordings and ahadith located in Sahih Sunni books and also the authentic hadith of Prophet Muhammed (saws)! Who is Mu'awiah to deny the true words of the Prophet?

And after asking this question, here we go, we begin a new sect, called, surprisingly:

Nasibism

On every step of their way in life, they validate Ali as a Kafir, and follow the Sunnah of Mu'awiah, via cursing Ali! Now this is a new religion based upon the hate of Ali, was this really how the Prophet spent his lifestyle? No!

Mu'awiah, who is known as Amir Al-Mu'mineen, the companion of the Prophet, the pillar of Islam. Somehow some way, gets away without being exposed! Even worse is the fact that he is cursing a Sahabi – companion, Ali! Isn't Ali a communion? Of course he is, the greatest companion of the Prophet, and after following the ideological logic of Ibn Taymiyyah, that cursing a companion is Kufr! And the person is a Kafir who disrespects the Sahabah, we see that Ali is being cursed by Mu'awiah, then shouldn't he be called a Kafir?

YES!

Point to note: I should have mentioned this before, but anyway, those reading this article, should be aware of the fact that when Mu'awiah asked to curse Saa'ad to curse Ali, the word – name “Ali” wasn't used, in fact, “Abu Turab” was, this is the genuine title for Ami Al-Mu'mineen Imam Ali (as) awarded by Prophet Muhammed (saws) to Imam Ali by the gracious will of Allah. And surprisingly, the “Father of mud” (as the name – Abu Turab's meaning suggests), u'awiah, and his prime Shi'ah, still go upon the opinion, that Ali should be cursed, and hated! Did Prophet Muhammed (saws) follow such a methodology, where he cursed Ali?

• Another point to note for extra knowledge is that the word “Sab” is used in arabic, to indicate a “Fie”, or a “curse” upon something or someone.

Validity and authenticity of narrations

Another book, Sunan Ibn Maajah – written by Ibn Majah Al-Qazwini. This book is investigated and edited by Sho'aib Arna'oot, Al-Risala Ala'alamia, Damascus, Syria, Al-Hijaaz, Al-Baroodi street, 1st Edition, published in 1430 A.H – Vol.1, p 88, Hadith No. 121 of this book, it states:

[Please note dear viewers, other publishing units, publishing this book, may have this particular narration in a different edition, or even maybe in a different volume or page...]

“Narration is from Saa'ad bin Abi Waqqas who has reported: Once Mu'awiah came to Hajj, and he (Saa'ad) visited him. They mentioned Ali and cursed Ali...”

Now over here, there is confusion for a while, which ends later on, did even Sa'aad curse Ali? In previous narrations, we have seen Mu'awiah only cursing Ali, but really, did Saa'ad too? Surely not, let's read on what the narration further says from Saa'ad bin Abi Waqqas:

“...After hearing, this, Saa'ad got angry...”

So there we go, we have our answer, you can't be cursing someone, and be angry upon yourself for cursing! It's lunacy, as Mu'awiah cursed Ali only. Let's finish the narration:

“...Saa'ad then proclaimed: You say such things about a man, for whom upon I have heard Prophet Muhammed (saws) say: Whomsoever master I am, Ali is his too!? Not only that, but I also heard Prophet Muhammed (saws) hear say: Ali's relation like to me is of Harun to Moosa, the only difference is that there is no Prophet after me! And I also heard him say on the day of Khaybar: I shall give the Stand Banner to the one who Allah and Prophet love him as well as him loving them too! And call Ali for me as I will give him the Banner!

Footnote of the ahadith commented by Arna'oot says: This is Saheeh – Authentic, and the chain of the narrators are also Thiqah – Trustworthy!

There we go, another huge reference, from a huge person, narrating a huge event. Those who say Saa'ad also cursed Mu'awiah, are denying, Saheeh Muslim, and Saa'ad bin Abi Waqqas's own words, where he confesses, I will not curse Ali due to 3 things... As mentioned in all of the narrations mentioned so far.

This indeed indicates the character of Mu'awiah, how he denied Imam Ali (as), and Prophet Muhammed (saws), as per the narration of Sho'aib Arna'oot, one of the greatest Ahadith Scholar, and highly respected personality in Sunni Sect of Islam.

He says in the footnotes of the Ahadith, at the end of the page: Saheeh, as every narrator, even in other books, are Thiqah, reliable!

Another Sunni book, Saheeh Sunan Ibn Majah, authored by Allama Albani, Vol. 1, p 58, Hadith No. 120 of this book, states the very same rivayah, a mirror reflection of the verses quoted by Saheeh Muslim, and other very highly regarded Sunni books! That Mu'awiah and Saa'ad bin Abi Waqqas were sitting, and Mu'awiah cursed Ali and so on.... The very same! But the thing to note here everyone is that Allama Albani mentions this narration, perfectly authentic,in its footnotes, and ascribes them per other narrations from other Sunni books too!

But another gem to notice here is that, Allama Albani comments upon the sentence of the narration: “He cursed him, means Mu'awiah cursed Imam Ali and insulted him with disgusting language”

From this sentence we can signify the fact that it was Mu'awiah, whom cursed Imam Ali (as), and not Saa'ad, and upon this rivayah, from Allama Albani, we see Mu'wiah in the act of Kufr.

And this narration in Allama Albani's Sunan Ibn Majah, is mirrored in another book called Sharh Sunan Ibn Majah, written by Imam Al-Sindi. Imam Al-Sindi's full name: Imam Abil Hassan Al-Hanafi, who lived around 1138 A.H, investigated by Sheikh Khaleel Ma'moon Sheeha, Al-Ma'rifa institution, Beirut, Lebanon, 3rd Edition. This particular edition of the book was published in 1420 A.H.

Imam Al-Sindi in his book on page 86 writes:

“His saying: 'he cursed him' means Mu'awiah cursing Ali, and also abusing him and insulting.”

Do note our viewers and readers, that he is a Hanafi, and not Shi'ah Rafidhi! And he himslef admitts in his book, clearly, that it was Mu'awiah, the one who cursed Imam Ali (as), and not Saa'ad. Please note everyone, the same incident is is mentioned fully, though just for time, I've saved it from mentioning that. It's the very same incident, the discussion between Saa'ad and Mu'awiah, not even a comma difference between the books I've presented!

Pay sincere attention to this everyone, this is a rivayah from Mussanaf Ibn Abi Shayba, written by Imam Abi Shayba, who lived from 159 A.H to 235 A.H, Investigated and edited by Muhamed Awaama, Uloom Al-Quran Institution. It states in Vol. 17, p 101, Hadith No. 32471;

“Saa'ad and Mua'wiah were sitting, they mentioned Ali......... And Mu'awiah cursed Ali!”

Amazing, Imam Abi Shayba, one of the most reliable personalities in Sunni sect of Islam, is approving the fact that it was Mu'awiah, whom cursed Imam Ali only, and not Saa'ad! The narration is same, and Saa'ad got up and said I will not curse Ali due to 3 things, and those 3 things have been mentioned... The very same narration.

And something even more fantastically amazing here is that, the footnote recorded Imam Abi Shayba says: The chain of narrators and not just Saheeh – Authentic, but Powerful! They are powerful, and this indicates them being truthful!

There everyone, were probably the most authenticated references I have presented to you, from different Sunni books! Some even being Salafi, and admired by al of the Muslims! I just have s imple question to ask:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Can you 'actually' handle the truth?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

Mu'wiah was a Nasibi!

Nasb as mentioned in Siyar A'laam Al-Nubalaa, investigated by Sho'aib Arna'oot, Vol. 4, mentions:

“Nawasib are those Hypocrites which embrace the hate of Ali as a part of their religion”

Pay sincere attention here readers, look at this book of a huge status in Sunni sect and especially Shaf'i sect is saying: Nawasib are those whom embrace the hate for Ali as a part of their religion! What surprises me even more is that he is using the word: Hypocrites!

Mu'awiah hated Ali from head to toe, he was the head example of all the Nawasibs, and began this new religion! Amazing, such Nawasib say they love Allah, follow the tawheed, via hating Ali! And embracing that status as a part of their religion too!

Mu'awiah and the Banu Ummayah are Nawasibs

Al Bidayah Wal-Nihayah, By Al-Hafiz Imaadul-Deen Ibn Katheer Al-Qurashi Al-Damishqi (who lived died 774 A.H). Pay sincere attention yet again readers, he is one of the clan leaders of Banu Umayah after Mu'awiah himself! In Vol. 17, p 373, Ibn Al-Katheer states:

“Sheikh Imaad Ul-Deen Ibn Katheer said: Thereafter I too composed verses of poetry”

He mentioned a few verses which were written by other Fudhala'a. And after that he says the above statement. What are these verses of his Poetry then? He states:

“That's how the Ummayad Caliphs followed. Their period of time was to that of the Rafidhi's. But their era was incomplete, and couldn't finish the 100 years. And all of them were Nawasibs!

“And all of them were Nawasibs!” This is what the head clan of Banu Ummayah is saying!

These were the words of dear viewers Ibn Al-Katheer, and he is saying, that all the Banu Ummayah Caliphs were Nawasibs, isn't Mu'awiah one of the Caliphs within them? Of course he is! And therefore, accordingly to another reference, stated before, we read that Nawasibs are Hypocrites, and Mu'awiah, must be, should be, and is and will be, and was a Hypocrite!

But then he writes: “Well except Imam Omar Ibn Abil Aziz”

But someone might stand up and object Mu'awiah wasn't a Nawasib, if anyone does say that, he is probably the most stupid person, as we have given so many books to prove his religion. Well notice what he says next:

“Mu'awiah, followed by his son Yazid!”

Amazing, and look at what the author says: “This includes Mu'awiah”

Imam Dhahabi, and Ibn Al-Katheer, approve of the fact that Mu'awiah, was a Nasibi! And the book further goes on to state: Marwaan Ibn Al-Hakam and others, whom came into Caliphate, and were all Nawasibs!

Now let's define a Nasibi, alone shall we, who are these people? We have had a book insight which states clearly, whom they are, but really, what do other books, of great personalities in Sunni Islam say about the beliefs of Nasibis? Let's read on...

Defining a Nawasib

Qamus, page 53, Chapter

1. Taj al Uroos, Volume 4 page 277
2. Lisan al Arab, page 762
3. Hadiya al Sahil ay adalta al Masail, page 96
4. Tadrib al-Rawi, Volume 1 page 328
5. Akrab al Muwarid, page 2
6. Siyar Alam al-Nubala, Vol 4 page 37 & vol 18 page 201
7. Al-Talimaat Al-Mukhtasar Ala Matan Al-Aqida al-Tahawiyah, vol 1 page 203

Ibn Manzur states in In Lisan al Arab:

والنَّواصِبُ قومٌ يَتَدَيَّنُونَ ببِغْضَةِ عليّ عليه السلام

“Nawasib are those who embrace the hate of Ali (as) as part of their faith”

In Taj al Uroos, we read:

النَّوَاصِبُ والنّاصِبيَّةُ وأَهْلُ النَّصْبِ : وهم المُتَدَيِّنُون بِبغْضَةِ سيّدِنا أَميرِ المُؤْمنينَ ويَعْسُوب المُسْلِمينَ أَبي الحسنِ عَلِيّ بْنِ أَبي طالبٍ رضِيَ الله تعالى عَنْهُ وكَرَّم وجْهَهُ

Nawasib: “Are those who hate the commander of believers and the leader of Muslims Abu al-Hassan Ali bin Abi Talib [ra]“.

Imam Jalaluddin Suyuti states in Tadrib al-Rawi:

بالنصب وهو بغض علي رضي الله عنه وتقديم غيره

“Nasb is hating Ali [ra] preferring the others”

We read the following in the margin of Imam Dhahabi’s famed book Siyar Alam al-Nubala (Vol 4 page 37) by Shaykh Shu’aib al-Arnaout:

من الناصبية وهم المنافقون المتدينون ببغضة علي رضي الله عنه ، سموا بذلك لأنهم نصبوا له وعادوه

“From Nasibiyah, there comes Nasibi and they are hypocrites, they have made the hate of Ali as their religion. This name was given to them because they have made the hate of Ali as their aim of life (Nasbu) and had enmity for him”

Notice something, the same book is mentioned again, he approves on a different page, the hate for Ali, is the sign of Nasibism! What more proofs would you want?

Further more...

In volume 18 page 201 we read:

والنصب هو: بغض علي رضي الله عنه، وموالاة معاوية.

“Nasb means to have grudge against Ali (ra) and love Muawiya”

One of the famous Wahabi scholars from Saudi Arabia namely Shaykh Saleh al-Fawzan stated in his book ‘Al-Talimaat Al-Mukhtasar Ala Matan Al-Aqida al-Tahawiyah’:

وأما النواصب: فيوالون الصحابة، ويبغضون بيت النبي عليه الصلاة والسلام، ولذلك سموا بالنواصب؛ لنصبهم العداوة لأهل بيت النبي عليه الصلاة والسلام.

“The Nawasib, befriend the Sahaba and hate the family of the prophet (pbuh), therefore they have been called Nawasib for hating Ahlulbayt of the prophet (pbuh)”.

Hadiya al Sahil elaborates yet further:

“Nasibi ideology is a type of flawed character that is very bad, in its worst form is has a hatred for the Imam of Guidance Ali, and takes this as part of its Deen / Iman”.

Al Muhaddith Shah Abdul Aziz makes two interesting comments in his Hidayatul Majeediyah, page 813:

“One who fights Ali [r] with enmity is a kaffir according to the ijma of Ahl’ul Sunnah.”

Furthermore...

“Whoever deems Ali [r] to be a kaffir or opposes his khilafath is a kaffir, this trait was evident amongst the Khawaarij at Naharwaan”.

Haddeeya Mujedeeya by Al Muhaddith Shah Abdul Aziz Dehlavi page 813

There were few references, which state clearly, who is a Nasibi, what are his characteristics, and what is their main role in the religion. To hate Ali of course! There are to be honest, 20-50 more books to be referred, in regards to as what a Nasibi is, and how he follows his rules, but as me and you may know, time is the variable which stops us from reading, and also the length of the article too. Now continuing upon the status of Mu'awiah's so called Islam.

Fath Al-Bari Sharh Saheeh Bukhari, written by Hajar Al-Asqalani, in Vol. 13, p 669 of the book, he states: “It was mentioned in Sharh Alwajeez by Alrafi when he mentioned the Khawariji, he said: They are a group of innovators, whom oppose Ali”

Khawarijis are whom? “A group of innovators”, whom oppose Ali! We have our answer, but is that it, in means to gain knowledge of just innovators called by the Umayad Leader? No, in fact, let us read what he further said about the Khawarijis besides labelled innovators!

“Then he (Ibn Hajar), further states: 'His (Alrafi's words) about the description of Khawarijis is not limited to them just being called innovators, but it also includes the Nawasib, whom were the followers of Mu'awih in Siffeen!”

Amazing, both, Khawaijis and Nasibis oppose Ali, and Ibn Hajar, the highly respected personality, says people, whom were in the army, fought for Mu'awiah, at the battle of Siffeen, against Ali, were Nawasib! And as we defined a Nawasib earlier, the one who has hate for Ali, and the love for Mu'awiah! I ask once again:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Can you 'actually' handle the truth?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

Khawarij, aren't just the ones to oppose Ali, but are also innovators, whom add something to Islam and religion's aspects, which isn't allowed! Truly and utterly unbelievable, isn't it? And within them contains the arch mark of Nawasib as well! Do we still need to go over the ahaidth, as to whom is Mu'awiah, and what his religion Nasbism is?

But unfortunetly, the question still exists after so much research and study, does hatred for Imam Ali (as) really make someone a Hypocrite or an infidel? Let us find that out in detail too, with the greatest of sources to begin with.

Saheeh Muslim, written by Imam Muslim, p 60, Hadith No. 78. The Hadith is within the Chapter 33 “Book of Faith” states:

“From Ali Ibn Thabit, from Zirr, who said: Ali said: By the one who splits open the seed and created something living, the Apostle of Allah gave me a promise that none but a believer would love me, and none but a hypocrite would hate me.

There was Saheeh Muslim, figurative upon the fact that only a hypocrite would hate Imam Ali (as). And that was according to the holy words of Prophet Muhammed (saws). Didn't Mu'awiah hate Imam Ali? I hope the answer isn't anonymous...

Musnad of Imam Ahmed Ibn Hanbal, investigated by Sheikh Sho'aib Arna'oot, states in Vol. 2, p 71:

“Ali said: By Allah!... Prophet Muhammed (saws) gave me a promise, that none but a hypocrite would hate me, and none but a believer would love me!”

Arna'oot commentating on this piece of text: The Chain of narration is according to the conditions set by the 2 Sheikhs.

2 immaculately well known books in the sect of Sunni Islam, openly agree upon the ahadith of Prophet Muhammed (saws), that loving Ali, is the sign of a Mo'min, and only a Mo'min would love Ali, and hating Ali, is the sign of Hypocrisy, and only Hypocrites hate Ali! Mu'awiah, for sure, by now me and you know, didn't love Ali, but hated him, so he is a Kafir and a Munafiq!

Stay put, Imam Ali (as) is taking an oath here, he isn't swearing by himself of anything else, but Allah! And for someone like him to swear, there is no credibility of the fact that this hadith is fake...

But as we go into further study and research, we read, that the person hating Ali isn't only a Munfaiq, but the one who hates Allah too! Amazing, and the one who hates Allah is without a doubt a person to be burnt in hell! Let's further read:

Tareekh Al-Khulafa, written by Imam Jalaluddin Sayuti (who died in the year 911 A.H). Investigated by Ibrahim Saleh. Saadir institution, Beirut. In page 206 of this book, we read: (Pay sincere attention everyone)

“And it is written by Tabarani with an authentic chain of narrators from Umme Salma from the Messenger of Allah (saws) whom said: Whosoever loves Ali, loves me, and whoever loves me, loves Allah! But whosoever hates Ali, he hates me, and whosoever hates me, hates Allah!

Whoever hates Ali, hates Allah, and whoever loves Ali, loves Allah. Through the research we have come along, we notify, that Mu'awiah, really hated Ali, that certainly means, that he hated Allah too! Isn't life simple to understand without Mullas online? Yes it is, and to be honest, life without idiots is much better too, I'm sure you're not the one to deny the fact that Ali was hated by Mu'awiah, and Mu'awiah, through the call of Prophet Muhammed (saws) also hated Allah!

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Can you 'actually' handle the truth?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

I hope you can handle the truth, as I know, it's not easy to convert to a faith, where there is a majority, and not a minority, behind your back. But really, it's not what the amount matters, it's what the Eiman of the amount matters.

Albani in Vol. 3, p 287, states in Hadeeth No. 1299 of the well known book: Silsala Al-Saheeh;

Author says the ahadith of Prophet Muhammed (saws): “Whoever loves Ali, loves me, and whoever loves me, loves Allah. Whomsoever hates Ali, hates me, and whomsoever hates me, hates Allah!”

The author further writes on the page:

“Narrated by Al-Mukhlis in Al-Fawaa'id Al-Muntaqaat with an authentic chain of narrators from Umme Salma: who said: I bear witness, that I heard Prophet Muhammed (saws) say: Whoever hates Ali, hates me, and whoever hates me, hates Allah! And whoever loves Ali, loves me, and whoever loves me, loves Allah!

Mr Albani mentions other sources, and how they regard it, as mentioned Al-Mukhli, regards this as highly authentic. And so does Saheeh Muslim, and Albani himself on the same page of his book!

• Lets take a brake here, and shortly discuss the article.
• I'm Raees Mustafa
• I've written this article to not entertain, but help people to come to the path of “Thaqalayn” the 2 mighty things, Quran and The AhlulBayt.
• AhlulBayt (as)'s first Imam is Ali (as)
• Imam Ali (as) is somehow hated by Mu'awiah.
• And this article proves him actually hating Imam Ali (as).
• And what is his religion, his identity and faith according to the historians, from Sunni and Salafi sects!

So far so good? Mu'awiah, without a shadow of doubt hated Imam Ali (as), and he deserves the ultimate punishment for this, and for the one whom is hated by Allah, via the authentic wordings of Prophet Muhammed (saws), why do you regard him as a great personality of Islam? Indeed, it's a question to be asked, and a question to be answered! What else? Before going into the last prosthetic reference, let's ask a question to ourselves as “one”. Can anyone, who hates Imam Ali, and Prophet Muhammed (saws), and Allah, be a Muslim? Well though a question may be stupid, some stupid doesn't agree, and we have to write this on our tongue's to convince them to the reality. Let's see what knowledge has it in for us...

Book: Masa'il Ahmed Ibn Hanbal – Narrations of ibn Ibraheem Ibn Hani Al-Nisabouri Narration 1866 of this book he says: “I heard Aba Abdullah (Ahmed Ibn Hanbal), and he was told by Dalaway that I heard Ibn Al-Ja'ad.”

Actually before we go into this, let's just be known, whom Dalaway, and Ali Ibn Ja'ad are. Pay great attentions, dear viewers, this is another gem of a reference.

Dalaway, for him, let's turn to a HUGE sunni book, called Siyar A'laam Al-Nubalaa (as mentioned before) Vol. 12, p 120. We see, that Dalaway's name is Ziyad Ibn Ayyub.

The book further states: “Al-Imam, the great Hafidh, also known as Al-Dalaway”.

The author further writes: “Al-Bukhari narrated from him, Abu Dawood narrated fro him, and Tirmidhi and Nasa'i also narrated from him.”

We moreover read: “Abu Hatim said he is truthful, and Ibraheem Ibn Arooma said: None on this earth is more reliable and truthful than Ziyad Ibn Ayyub!”

This was for you my dear readers, the status of whom? Dalaway, he is known as Ziyad Ibn Ayyub, and was a great personality, for whom even some said: The most truthful, and the most reliable on the planet! Well that is to some extent too, but it is talking in the sense of non-Ma'sumeen and the narrators of Ahadith of course... So we can fully rely with out eyes closed that Dalaway, will not steal gold, though in this case, not damage the ahadith, and fabricate it...

As for Al-Ibn Al-Ja'ad, Vol. 10, p 459, of the same book, Siyar Al-A'laam, we read the book state:

“He – Ali Ibn Al-Ja'ad Al-Imam, Hafidh, an authoritative proof.”

The book goes unto the next page (500) to state: “Al-Bukhari narrated from him, and Abu Dawood, and Yahya Ibn Mu'een, and Khalaf Ibn Saalim, and Ahmed Ibn Hanmbal and many more...”

There you go, respected readers, I have presented in front of you the Sanad of the ahadith, which I will show you, and have proven it authentic with great references too... Now let's see what the narration says:

“I heard Aba Abdullah (Ahmed Ibn Hanbal), and he was told by Dalaway that I heard Ibn Al-Ja'ad. He (Ahmed Ibn Hanbal) said: Mu'awiah died on a religion other than Islam”

For whom the historians are saying, that he (Ziyad bn Ayyub) is the most reliably person in the world, for whom reliable and Saheeh Books say as the Sheikh of Hadith (Ali Ibn Al-Ja'ad), they narrate, from the Imam of Ahlul-Sunnah, that Mu'awiah died upon a religion, other than Allah...

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Can you 'actually' handle the truth?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

I myself, personally was in shock of moment, as reading a statement from an Imam of Sunni sect, is terrifying! What a proof, if this doesn't guide you, I ask what will? Well, is that it? Of course not, let's close the talk, with another Death defying proof from authentic books of Sunni sect, which quote ahadith from them, which I promise, will leave you amazed!

Nahjul Balagha's authenticity is unbelievably clear and founded, as 11 Sunni commentators done its recognition, and have announced it a permanent truth! They are:

1. Imam Ahmed bin Muhammed Al-Way'ri (who died about 470 A.H)
2. Abul Hassan Ali bn Abil Qasim Al-Bayhaqi (65 A.H). His commentry is quoted by Mojam Al-Odaaba of Yaqoot Hamwi Vol. 13, p 225, printed in Egypt.
3. Imam Kakfrodeen Razi (606 A.H). His commentries of Nahjul-Balagha are quoted by:

I) Akhbarol Hokama of Ibn Quftee – p 192, printed in Egypt.

II) Oyoonul-Abiyaa of Ibn Abi Shabee'a – p 25, printed in Egypt.

4. Abdul Hameed Hibatollah Muhammed bn- Muhammed bn-abil Hadeed-Motazili (known as bn Abil Hadeed – 655 A.H). His commentary is a world famous classic covering 17 volumes, printed 6 times in Cairo, Beirut, Tehran and Isfahaan.
5. Sheikh Kamaloddeen Abdur-Rahman Shaybaani (705 A.H)
6. Allama Sadroddeen Taftazaani (797 A.H).
7. Qazi of Baghdad, Sheikh Qewaamoddeen.
8. Allama Sheikh Muhammed Abdoo (1323 A.H). His commentary has been printed very often and forms a part of the univeristy course in Cairo and Beirut.
9. Ostaad (Professor) Muhammed Hassan An-Nayyer Al-Morsaafi of Egypt. His commentary is printed in Darol-Kitab Press Cairo (Egypt).
10. Ostaad (Professor) Muhammed Moheeddeen Abdul-Hameed, Professor of Lexicography of Al-Azhar University. His book was printed at Isteqaama Misr Press – Cairo.
11. Ostaad (Professor) Sheikh Abdillah Al-Beerooni of Cairo (Egypt).

There my respected readers, 11, huge Sunni commentators of this book Nahjul Balagha, and from them, and their commentaries, we read their authenticity of firm belief upon every full stop and dot of this book.

We read Imam Ali (as) giving a Khutba (sermon), Sermon 57in Nahjul-Balagha:

SERMON 57

Amir al-mu'minin said to his companions about Mu'awiyah

أَمَّا إنِّهُ سِيَظْهَرُ (1) عَلَيْكُمْ بَعْدِي رَجُلٌ رَحْبُ الْبُلْعُومِ (2) ، مُنْدَحِقُ الْبَطْنِ (3) ، يَأْكُلُ مَا يَجِدُ، وَيَطْلُبُ مَا لاَ يَجِدُ، فَاقْتُلُوهُ، وَلَنْ تَقْتُلُوهُ! أَلاَ وَإِنَّهُ سَيَأْمُرُكُمْ بِسَبِّي وَالْبَرَاءَةِ مِنِّي; فَأَمَّا السَّبُّ فَسُبُّونِي، فَإِنَّهُ لِي زَكَاةٌ،وَلَكُمْ نَجَاةٌ; وَأَمَّا الْبَرَاءَةُ فَلاَ تَتَبَرَّأُوا مِنِّي، فَإِنِّي وَلِدْتُ عَلَى الْفِطْرَةِ، وَسَبَقْتُ إِلَى الْإِيمَانِ وَالْهِجْرَةِ.

Soon after me there would be put on you a man with a broad mouth and a big belly. He would swallow whatever he gets and would crave for what he does not get. You should kill him but (I know) you would not kill him. He would command you to abuse me and to renounce me. As for abusing you do abuse me because that would mean purification for me and salvation for you. As regards renunciation you should not renounce me because I have been born on the natural religion (Islam) and was foremost in accepting it as well as in Hijrah ( migrating from Mecca to Medina). ⁽¹⁾

---

(1). When Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr had been killed Mu'awiyah sent 'Abdullah ibn 'Amir al-Hadrami to Basrah to exhort the people of Basrah for avenging 'Uthman's blood because the natural inclination of most of the inhabitants of Basrah and particularly of Banu Tamim was towards 'Uthman. Consequently he stayed with Banu Tamim. This was the time when 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbis the governor of Basrah had gone to Kufahfor condolence about Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr leaving Ziyad ibn 'Ubayd (Abih) as his substitute. When the atmosphere in Basrah began to deteriorate ziyad informed Amir al-mu'minin of all the facts. Amir al-mu'minin tried to get Banu Tamim of Kufah ready but they kept complete silence and gave no reply. When Amir al-mu'minin saw this weakness and shamelessness on their part he gave this speech namely that "During the days of the Prophet we did not see whether those killed at our hands were our kith and kin but whoever collided with Right we were prepared to collide with him. If we too had acted carelessly or been guilty of inaction like you then neither religion could have taken root nor could Islam prosper." The result of this shaking was that A'yan ibn Dabi'ah al-Mujashi'i prepared himself but on reaching Basrah he was killed by the swords of the enemy. Thereafter Amir al-mu'minin sent off Jariyah ibn Qudamah as-Sa'di with fifty men of Bani Tamim. First he tried his best to canvass his own tribe but instead of following the right path they stooped down to abusing and fighting. Then Jariyah called Ziyad and the tribe of Azd for his help. Soon on their arrival ('Abdullah) Ibn al-Hadrami also came out with his men. Swords were used from both sides for some time but eventually lbn al-Hadrami fled away with seventy persons and took refuge in the house of Sabil as-Sa'di. When Jariyah saw no other way he got this house set on fire. When fire rose into flames they came out in search of safety but could not succeed in running away. Some of them were crushed to death under the wall while others were killed.

(2). About the person to whom Amir al-mu'minin has alluded in this sermon some people hold that he is Ziyad ibn Abih; some hold that he is al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf ath-Thaqafi and some hold that he is Mughirah ibn Shu'bah. But most of the commentators have held him to be Mu'awiyah and this is correct because the qualities that Amir al-mu'minin has described prove true fully on him alone .Thus Ibn Abi'l-Hadid has written about the gluttonous quality of Mu'awiyah that once the prophet sent for him and he was informed that Mu'awiyah was busy eating. Then a second and third time a man was sent to call him but he brought the same news. Thereupon the Prophet said "May Allah never satisfy his belly." The effect of this curse was that when he felt tired of eating he would say "Take away for by Allah I am not satiated but I am tired and disgusted." Similarly his abusing Amir al-mu'minin and ordering his officers for it are such accepted facts of history about which there is no scope of denying. In this connection such words were used on the pulpit that even Allah and the Prophet were hit by them. Thus Umm al-mu'minin Umm Salamah wrote to Mu'awiyah "Certainly you people abuse Allah and the Prophet and this is like this that you hurl abuses on 'Ali and those who love him while I do stand witness that Allah and the Prophet did love him." (al-'Iqd al-Farid Vol. 3 p. 131)

Thanks to 'Umar ibn 'Abdil-'Aziz who put a stop to it and introduced the following verse in place of abuse in the sermons:

Verily Allah enjoineth justice and benevolence (to others) and giving unto the kindred and forbidden lewdness and evil and rebellion; He exhorteth you that ye may take heed (Qur'an 16:90)

In this sermon Amir al-mu'minin has ordered his killing on the basis of the Prophet's order that "When you (O' Muslims) see Mu'awiyah on my pulpit kill him." (Kitab Siffin pp. 243 248; Sharh of Ibn Abi'l-Hadid Vol. 1 p.348; Ta'rikh Baghdad Vol. 12 p. 181; Mizan al-I'tidal Vol. 2 p. 128; Tahdhib at-tahdhib Vol. 2 p. 428; Vol. 5 p. 110; Vol. 7 p. 324)

Mu'awiah is being ordered to kill by Prophet Muhammed (saws)! Why, just because of the fact that if Mu'awiah is seen on the Pulpit of Prophet Muhammed (saws), you should kill him! Amazing! Stunning! Petrifying! Unbelievable! How can that be, I thought he was a companion of a Prophet Muhammed (saws)! The one who doesn't even commit any crime, whilst sitting on the Pulpit of Prophet (saws), is ordered to be killed! And that in the Mosque as well! That means Mu'awiah, is the chief of infidels! What more do you want?

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Can you 'actually' handle the truth?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

What else? Is there still something in the magic wand left to show some more spectacular magic? Yes, apparently, and this one is another huge boost too, to the Eiman...

We read in Nahjul-Balagha once againt, and this time, not in the Sermons, but in the Hadith section of Imam Ali (as) in Nahjul Balagha. Let's read:

262. وقيل: إنّ الحارث بن حَوْطٍ أتاه فقال: أتُراني أظنّ أصحابَ الجمل كانوا على ضلالة؟ فقال عليه السلام: يَا حَارِثُ، إِنَّكَ نَظَرْتَ تَحْتَكَ وَلَمْ تَنْظُرْ فَوْقَكَ فَحِرْتَ إِنَّكَ لَمْ تَعْرِفِ الْحَقَّ فَتَعْرِفَ مَنْ أَتَاهُ ,وَلَمْ تَعْرِفِ الْبَاطِلَ فَتَعْرِفَ مَنْ أَتَاهُ. فقال الحارث: فإنّي أَعتزل مع سعيد بن مالك وعبد الله بن عمر. فقال عليه السلام: إِنَّ سَعِيداً وَعَبْدَ اللهِ بْنَ عُمَرَ لَمْ يَنْصُرَا الْحَقَّ، وَلَمْ يَخْذُلاَ الْبَاطِلَ.

(1)

262- It is said that al-Harith ibn Hawt came to Amir al-mu'minin, and said: Do you believe I can ever imagine that the people of Jamal were in the wrong? Amir al-mu'minin, peace be upon him, said: O' al-Harith! You have seen below yourself but not above yourself, and so you have been confused. Certainly, you have not known right, so that you can recognize the righteous. And you have not known wrong, so that you can recognize the people of wrong! Then al-Harith said: In that case, I shall withdraw  along with Sa'd ibn Malik and 'Abdullah: ibn 'Umar; whereupon  Amir al-mu'minin, peace be upon him, said: Verily, Sa'd and 'Umar have neither sided with Right nor forsaken Wrong. (1)

____________________________________________________________________

(1). Sa'd ibn Malik (i.e. Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas, the father of 'Umar ibn Sa'd who killed Imam Husayn) and 'Abdullah ibn 'Umar were among those who were keeping themselves away from Amir al-mu'minin's help and support. As for Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas, after the killing of 'Uthman he retired to some wilderness and passed his life there, but did not agree to swear allegiance to Amir al-mu'minin (as Caliph). But after the death of Amir al-mu'minin he used to express his repentance, saying, "I held an opinion but it was a wrong opinion." (al-Mustadrak, al-Hakim, vol.3, p. 116). And when Mu`awiyah blamed him for not supporting him in his fight with Amir al-mu'minin, Sa'd said:

I only repent for not having fought against the rebellious group (i.e. Mu'awiyah and his people). (Ahkam al-Qur'an, al-Jassas al-Hanafi, vol.2, pp.224,225; al-Furu', Ibn Muflih al-Hanbali, vol.3, p.542)

As for `Abdullah ibn 'Umar, although he had sworn allegiance, he refused to help Amir al-mu'minin in the battles putting forth the excuse: "I have sought seclusion to devote myself to worship and do not therefore want to involve myself in war and fighting."

A Persian couplet says:

Intelligence regards such excuses worse than the offence itself.

Abdullah ibn 'Umar also frequently used to express his repentance, even up to the last moments of his life, saying:

I do not find anything in myself to be distressed about in this world, except my not having fought alongside Ali ibn Abi Talib against the rebellious group as Allah, to Whom belongs Might and Majesty, had commanded me. (al-Mustadrak, vol.3, pp.115 - 116; as-Sunan al-kubra, al-Bayhaqi, vol.8, p.172; at-Tabaqat, Ibn Sa'd, vol.4, part l, pp.136, 137; aljst1.'ab, vol.3, p.953; Usd al-ghabah, vol.3, p.229; vol.4, p.33; Majma' az-zawa'id, vol.3, p.182; vol.7, p.242; al-Furu', vol.3, p.543; Ruh al-ma'ani; al-Alusi, vol.26, p.151).

Mu'awiah, is found disregarded by Saa'ad, and is objected as a cruel, useless and a hypocritical person! What else do you want, there are questions to be asked, and questions to be answered!

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Can you 'actually' handle the truth?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

O Allah, forgive us all, for our bad sins...