Thursday 27 June 2013

David Wood - just another puppet in the 21st century.

Salaam dear viewers...

Recently on You-Tube I've been watching some videos of this man called David Wood. His speeches and debates are widely known around the world, and through one of his encounters, we are told that he has converted one Muslim during his lifetime too - as far as I'm sure. He's been like a virus spreading on the computers, and absolutely brainwashing people with his stupendous Muslim resources references.

He appears on the show Jesus or Muhammad? regularly with his guests and a host who knows nothing but to accept the phone calls of Sunnis! It's the God Damn truth guys! David Wood (below center) has his own blog called http://www.answeringmuslims.com/ and has his articles and views also published on http://www.answering-islam.org/ web too. 


Through out his speeches and shows, there is one thing which I really want to know, has this man ever had a debate with a Shia Scholar's perspective of looking Islam? And as far as I know, NO! Continuously throughout his debates, he refers to Bukhari and Muslim, and fools the Muslims (Sunni by the way) easily with strong references that Rasool-ul-Allah (God forbid) was a pedophile, child raper and so forth.

Therefore, dear viewers, there are 2 things which we can conclude here,
a) Sunni resources tell us straight on how rude they are to the Prophet of Allah (swt)
b) And I insha'allah have taken a step against them, and are preparing articles in reply to them.

Dear viewers, I will ensure you some strong proofs regarding my perspective of Islam, and will tell the world - how strong a religion Islam is! And by religion Islam, I mean Shia Islam of course. Just be patient dear viewers, just be patient...

Raees Mustafa  

Imam Hussain (as)'s blood was everywhere...

Brief signs of Imam Hussain (as) displayed by naturalisation.











Article By: Raees Mustafa

















Introduction;

Assalamu Alaykum – Dear brothers, 10th Muharram is a poisonous day for a disbeliever, and he wants to do anything he can, to make the day of mourning of a believer, be dreadful. Though really, I don't get it, when some Shias do perform this, they end up (God forbid) being attacked by Lunatics, by Infidels. What they don't understand is that they should start bombing or attacking per the history recently, to such natural objects, which are hard to even explain how they are doing this, and even harder, why should we do this or that to them.

Don't get confused, I'm like it, in other words, the worlds of Allah mourn for Imam Hussain (as), the natural sources cry and weep for Imam Hussain (as) and so does the Prophet (saws), try calling him (saws) an infidel huh? They wont, because this will automatically enable them to become one! Just to shorten it up, my 8th article discusses nothing but questions to be asked and questions to be answered, I hope you find the article informative.


Who else cried for Hussain (as) other than Shias?

Al-Bidayah Wal-Nihayah, Vol. 2 – Book written by Al-Hafidh Imadul-Deen Abil Fidaa Ismaeel ibn Umer ibn Katheer Al-Qurashi Al-Damishqi (who dies approximately around 773 A.H). This particular book which I'm referring to you is investigated by Dr. Abdullah Abdul Muhsin At-Turki. A'lam Al-Kutub Institution for copying and publishing. As mentioned, in Vol. 2, p 573 of this particular publication, we read;

Qaalal Imam Ahmed: Hadathanaa Abdur-Rahman wa Affaan, Hadathanaa Hammaad ibn-Salama, An Ammar ibn Abi Ammar, An Ibn Abbase Qaala: Ra'aytun-Nabee (s) Fil Manaam Bi Nasfin-Nahaar. Ash'asa Aghbar. Ma'ahoo Qaaroorah Fee-haa Damun, Faqulto: Be Abee Anta wa Ummee Yaa Rasool-ul-Allah, Maa Haadha? Qaala: Haadha Dam-ul-Hussaine wa Ashaabeyhee. Lam Azal Al-Taqitohoo Munzul Youm. Qaala Amaar: Fa Ahsaynaa Dhaalika-al-Youm, Fawajadnaahoo Qad Qotila Fee Dhaalika-al Youm.”
Isnaado-hoo Qawiyun!
“And Imam Ahmed said: Abdurahman and Affan told us, Hammad ibn Salama reported from Ammar ibn Abi Ammar, who reported from Ibn Abbas, who said: I saw the Prophet (saws) in my dream during mid-day. He was dusty and dishevelled and he was holding a bottle of blood. I said: Let my mother and father be sacrificed for you 'O Messenger of Allah, what is this? He (Prophet) said: This is the blood of Hussain and his companions. This is the blood of Hussain and his companions. I have been collecting it since today. Ammar said: We memorised that day and then we found that he (Hussain) was killed on the same date.”
The chain of narration is strong!

The Prophet (saws) is seen in the middle of a day, in the land of Hejaz, carrying a bottle of blood. What is the chance you'll everyone, see a report, so fascinating as this one, containing the witnessing of the Messenger of Allah (saws) in someone's dream? And there would be a lot of accusations upon that Hadeeth being fabricated too, as per some Scholars. But I guess, whom on earth is here an Alim bigger than Ibn Katheer in this modern time, to argue Ibn Katheer on his recording of this report in Al-Nihaya? Just have a look at what Prophet (saws) said, this is the blood of Hussein and his companions! So Rasool-ul-Allah is giving special importance to not only Imam Hussain (as)'s bloodshed, but also his noble companions too! To those who think companions are the ones to only have lived during the lifetime of Prophet (saws) are wrong! These are what you call Companions mate!

But hang on, let's ask a question, what is Prophet (saws) doing in the middle of the day collecting blood, moreover, this isn't making any sense at all to me, how does Prophet (saws) know Hussain (as)'s death info? Well, let's begin by answering the last question first, Prophet (saws) knows everything, he is the master of the world, and is the greatest human being ever, he knows what happened and what didn't happen! Secondly, moving on, Prophet (saws) through the submission of the hadeeth, is on the day of Hussain (as)'s death date, this is 10th Muharram, and after the dream was seen, calculations were done regarding Prophet (saws) coming into the dream, and they figured out that Imam Hussain (as) died.

This goes to show the magnificence of the day of Ashoora, and the fact that how Prophet (saws) also commemorates and mourns over the death of his beloved grandson Imam Hussain (as).
We read in the Musnad of Imam Al-Humble, Vol. 4, investigated by Sho'aib Al-Arna'oot and Adil Murshid. Vol. 4, p 59 – the thing which I'm going to report to you is repeated on page 336 as well. We read;

An Ibn Abbase Qaala: Ra'aytun-Nabee (s) Fil Manaam Bi Nasfin-Nahaar. Ash'asa Aghbar. Ma'ahoo Qaaroorah Fee-haa Damun Yal-Taqitohoo Aou Yatatabahoo fee haa Shay'an. Qala: Qulto Ya Rasool-ul-Allah Maa Haadha? Haadha Damun Hussaine wa Ashabeyhee Lam Azal Al-Taqitohoo Munzul Youm. Qaala Amaar: Fa Ahsaynaa Dhaalika-al-Youm, Fawajadnaahoo Qad Qotila Fee Dhaalika-al Youm.”
Isnaadohoo Qawiyun Alaa Sharte Muslim.
From Ibn Abbas: I saw the Prophet (saws) in my dream during the mid-day and he was dishevelled and dusty. He was holding a bottle which contained the blood, or he was collecting something. I said: O Messenger of Allah, what is this? He replied: The blood of Hussain and his companions, and I have been collecting it since day-time. Ammar said: We memorized this day, and we found out that he (Imam Hussain) was killed on that day.
The Chain of narration is strong according to the conditions of Muslim.

Quiet amazing isn't it, it's worth mentioning what Sho'aib Al-Arna'oot said regarding its chain of narration further;

At-Tabarani narrated this in Hadeeth No. 2822 and 12837, Al-Hakim Al-Nisapouri narrated it in Mustadrak Vol. 4, p 397-398 from Hammad ibn Salama with this chain. Al-Hakim further authenticated it according to the conditions also set by Muslim, and Al-Dhahabi agreed with them too.

The Prophet (saws) on the day of Ashoora is collecting the blood of Imam Hussain (as), if you see this somewhat from an understanding angle, it's shocking that Hussain (as) is already dead, yet Rasool-ul-Allah is doing something mentally and physically impossible. We should remember, that this is within the dream, and within the dream Prophet of the earth comes down from Heaven, what is supposed, to collect the blood of Hussain, to mourn over Hussain, what did you do last Ashoora? Or for the year before, or even before? Whatever you did, I hope you followed the Sunnah, by collecting or shedding at least some tears compared to the act of Prophet (saws).

Now let's refer to another book, Majma Az-Zawa'id wa Manba'Al-Fawa'id, written by Al-Haythami al-Misri (807 A.H). Narration No. 15159, it states: The narration is;

Wa An-iz-Zuhri Qaala: Qaala Abdul Malik: Ayo Waahidin Anta in A'lamtanee, Aya Alaamatin Kaanat youma qatlal Hussain. Faqaala Qulto: Lam Turfa' Hasaatun Bey Bayt-il-Maqdis. Illa wojida Dahtahaa damun Abeet.
Arwaa'a hut-Tabarani wa Rijaalohoo Thiqaat.
From Az-Zuhri wo said: Adul Malik said: What a person (great person) you are if you told me what sign there was on the day Hussain was killed. I said: There was not a single stone that was lifted at Bayt-ul-Muqqadas unless they found blood flowing underneath it.
At-Tabarani narrated this and mentioned the narrators to be trustworthy.

This is a cosmological debate which needs understanding, look at the relation between the blood of Hussain (as) and the bleeding of the stones in Bayt-ul-Muqqadas. This tells us a spiritual motion of God in play, this tells us the magnificence of Hussain (as) rather, that even when Hussain (as) was many a mile away, the stones wept and knowing he was butchered in the land of Karbala by Yazidi Shias! Let's go onto the narration No. 15160;

Wa Aniz-Zuhri, Qaala: Maa rofi'a Bi-Shaamey Hajarun Youma Qatl-e-Al-Hussain ibn Ali, Illa Andam.
Wa-Arwaahu-Tabarani Rijaalohoo Rijal As-Saheeh
From Az-Zuhri who said: No stone was lifted on the day Hussain Ibn Ali was killed, except, they found blood underneath it.
Narrated by At-Tabarani and the narrators are the narrators of Saheeh (i.e. Saheeh Bukhari and Muslim).

So from another narration from Az-Zuhri, we find that not only stones at Bayt-al-Muqadas were bleeding tears for Hussain (as), no! There were all stones, to which there was a naturally established fact by God, to weep blood over Hussain (as)! If stones can do, why can't your hearts, the quran addresses to people whom have stone hearts, to follow Allah and his way, following Allah means completing, doing and fulfilling every aspect of his command, if stones can weep, why can't those even with the stone hearts?

As mentioned before, this is cosmological view, and a disturbing phase for those, whom don't like to hear the truth. It is I'm afraid, how the world is sometimes run...

And let's site yet another narration shall we, Hadeeth No. 15161, we read;

Qaala: Lamma Qotilal Hussain Ibn Ali, In-kasafat-As-Shams Kasfatan Hattaa Badat-al-Kawaakibo Nasfan-Nahaar. Hattaa Zanannaa Anna haa hiya.
When Hussain ibn Ali was killed, the sun eclipsed, and other planets appeared in the mid-day. Until we thought that was it! (Day of Judgement).

What is this? You may ask, and rightly so, when truth was in the so called hibernation under the pits of ignorance. At least that is what when you come over conclusions like these, that the murder of Hussain was bad, incredibly bad, veraciously bad! And Hussain (as) himself was unbelievably good! Incredibly good, spectacularly awesome! The planets appeared dear viewers, the planets! They came to mourn, the whole system is changing, since when did you see all the planets come at the same time, and mourn over Hussain (as)!

Really, we can go on and on, commenting on this with great logic, but really, it's up to you now to decide, which option is the best, sit down on the 10th Muharram, and see out of your window Shias mourning, and start to curse them, or go out there by yourself, and mourn like what planets and stones did, at least they know something...

Meanwhile, as usual;

O Allah, forgive us all, for our bad sins.


Wednesday 12 June 2013

How the Prophet cursed Banu Ummayah and their people!


___________________
How the Prophet cursed Banu Ummayah and their people!




Article By: Raees Mustafa


Introduction:

Assalamu Alaykum

Dear readers, this, by the graciousness of Allah, is my 6th successful article published, through sincere hard work, and research, not for the cause of mentioning upon grabbing attention, or showing off, of course not, I don't believe in that, and neither do believe in what the sons and the daughters of followers of Banu Ummayah did, done and are doing, for their Islam. It's a pleasure to be at the service of our 12th Imam, and guide people, or show the path of Mukhlasin.

In this article, we go through the undiscovered, and the sank, disappeared Sunnah of the Prophet, which was cursing Banu Ummayah, Marwaan Ibn Hakam (especially) and their generation. The so called Sunnis, try to perform the Sunnah of the Prophet, right? But don't always match up to the reality, and neither do they every want to.

Sunni books are specified in this piece of text, which examine, how and exactly when the Prophet of Islam, Muhammed (saws) cursed this clan. And upon for what reasons, are they hated by Shia's! I hope you enjoy the article. There are questions to be asked, and questions to be... answered!

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ

Kind Regards

Raees Mustafa





















Banu Ummayah hated the names of AhlulBayt Imams and especially “Ali”

Siyaral A'lam al-Nubala written by Imam Dhahabi, states in Vol. 5, p 101, of the book published fro Al-Risala institution. Biography number is 35 – Ulay bin Rabah;

Imam Dhabai states: He is a trustworthy Imam. Abu Musa al-Lakhmi al-Misri heard narrations from Amr ibn Al-Aas and he heard from Uqba ibn Amir and he from Abi Qatada al-Ansari, and he from Abdullah ibn Umer and he from group of companions.

Then he goes on to state on page 102:

...And he is from the greatest Scholars of Tabi'een. Abu Abdurahman Al-Murqi said whenever the Banu Ummayah would hear that a new born baby was named Ali, they would kill him!

Right, Banu Ummayah would kill the person for not being a follower of Ali, but for just having the name Ali! What hate, is this what Banu Ummayah are respected for? This is what Imam Dhahabi has mentioned in his book, Siyar A'lam, a highly well known publication. We further read on the same page of the book:

So when this reached (the news of murder of anyone who's name was even Ali), Rabah (father of Ulay) changed his name from Ali to “Ulay”.

Do you see the name connectivity between “Ali” and “Ulay”? There is some mess up in the name as it shows.

Siyar A'laam Al-Nubala, Vol. 10, p 400 – Biography of Allama Al-Hafidh Al-Sadiq Abul-Hassan Al-Madaa'ini. The book states about him:

He came to Baghdad and put a classification and he was very good in biographies, battle stories and lineages of Arab tales. He was honest in what he said with a high (saheeh – authentic) chain of narration.

Now let's turn to page 402:

Al-Madaa'ini narrated that he entered upon Ma'moon and mentioned to him the narrations about Ali. So he (Ma'moon) cursed Banu Ummayah. Al-Muthana ibn Abdillah Al-Ansari said: I was in Shaam (Syria) and I never heard the names Ali nor Hassan. But rather all I heard was Mu'awiah and Yazeed and Al-Waleed.

Banu Ummayah wanted to erase even the name of Ali, forget the followers, the names of Ali, Hassan and Hussain (likewise of the AhlulBayt). Is this what Banu Ummayah and their clan is so well known and respected for? They wanted to remove this name from the Islamic history, society and never let this name be alive! What was Imam Ali (as)'s (in particular) fault, with his sons and family? Just because they followed Prophet Muhammed (saws). That's all, though we encounter something else too;

Same book: Siyar A'lam Al-Nubala Vol. 10, p 402 (same page, but further historical info below) – Al-Madaa'ini further narrates;

Then I went past a man standing at his door, who ordered his son (Hassan) to fetch him water. I said: You named him Hassan?

So he said: My children are called Hassan and Hussain and Ja'far, because the people of Shaam (Syria) name their children after the Caliphs of Allah.
And then the man cursed his son.

So I said: I thought you were the best from among the people of Shaam (Syria), but I realised there will be nobody who is worse than you Hell fire!

So Ma'mun said: Never mind, that is why Allah curses their alive and dead people. He meant the Nawasib!

MY GOD!

They used to name their sons Hassan, Hussain and Ja'far etc... so they could curse them! And guess what, that same Sunni Alim in his well known Sunni book says the narration from Madaa'ini, mentioning “Caliphs of Allah”! We over here have come across another huge point everyone, Hassan, Hussain, Ali and further Masoomeen of Shia sect, are the Caliphs of Allah! And the one who goes against the Caliphs of Allah is not a Muslim!

What truth! Is this what Islam teaches us? No, but Kufr, the ultimate enemy of Islam, these people are of the lineage of Pagans dear readers, Mu'awiah, and Banu Ummayah, they still had a stitch of idol worshipping within them, and never ever really submitted their will to Allah and his Prophet's religion truly! Never ever! And that's what the big bearded illiterates wont teach you!

If the Banu Ummayah was so bad, and against the Prophet and Allah, how comes the Prophet never said anything bad about them? Well, let's see what the Prophet had said about such a clan of Ummayah!

The Prophet cursing Banu Ummayah!

Al-Matalib Al-Aaliya Biz'a'waa'id al-Masaaneed al-Thamaaniya - an incredibly well known book written by Hafiz Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalaani. Vol. 18, p 257 of the book states:

And just have a look at this title of the chapter everyone, it's not me saying what I want to, but it's:

Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalaani

it's

Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalaani

it's

Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalaani

Yes, Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalaani dear readers, one of the head clans of Banu Ummayah! Not me quoting this on my Eiman's behalf, but Ibn Hajar himself. Let's see, what he has just named the title of the chapter in Vol. 18, p 257:

Chapter of Rasullulah cursing al-Hakam ibn Abil-Aas and his sons and Banu Ummayah!

Amazing! The title tells us everything about what the chapter is based upon! I'm repeating again, this isn't me saying this, but Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalaani!
Who is Prophet Muhammed (saws) cursing? It's
  • Banu Ummayah
  • Marwaan Ibn Hakam
  • And the progeny of Banu Ummayah!

Prophet Muhamed (sas) is cursing, why can't we? It's a question to be asked and a question to be answered!

We read a few pages further in the same book, same volume at Hadith No. 4455;

It's related from Abi Yahya, who said: I was with al-Hassan and al-Hussain, and Marwaan cursed Al-Hussain!

Dear readers, I'm saying this over and over, it's not me saying this, but Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalaani, the chief head of Banu Ummayah! What did he say, he writes in his book a narration from Abi Yahya, whom narrates that Marwaan cursed Al-Hussain! Those who say Marwaan was good and a fine companion, is found cursing Al-Imam Al-Hussain (as), for whom the Prophet (saws) has been mentioned saying through some reporters;

Al-Naysaboorie quoted abu-Hazim and abu-Hurayra as saying: “ I saw the Messenger carrying al-Husayn son of ‘Alee and saying, “ O Allah, I love him, so love him”.References:
Al-Hakim described this Hadith’s ascription as credible but both of them did not publicize it, Mostadrak al-Saheehayn Ch.3 p.185. The same hadith was narrated mentioning al-Hasan instead; both are found, Mostadrak al-Saheehayn Ch.3 p.195.

Amazing, whom Allah and the Prophet love, someone else is cursing him! Are you telling me through the analyses of your faith, that Marwaan, and Banu Ummayah's untold stories are better and have more value that Allah and the Prophet's laid foundational Deen (religion)? If you are, I'm sorry to label you as an infidel! Marwaan, whom Sunnis portray as a great Caliph, and a companion of the Prophet, is cursing someone whom upon we read:

Al-Hakim ascribed this Hadith to abu-Horayra: “ The Prophet came out to us with al-Hasan and al-Husayn on his shoulders, kissing them alternatively until he came to the point where we were standing; a man then said, “ O Messenger of God, do you love them? He replied, “ Yes, whosoever loves them has loved me and whosoever hates them has hated me”.References:
Mostadrak al-Saheehayn Ch.3 p.182/Al-Bidaya Wa al-Nihaya Ch.8 p.35, 205.

So Marwaan therefore hates Prophet Muhammed (saws), as he hates Imam Hussain (as)! And this isn't me saying dear readers, it's

Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalaani

We further read dear readers: (same Hadith Number)

Marwaan said: Let the AhlulBayt be cursed! So Al-Hussain got angry and said: Are you cursing the AhlulBayt? For By Allah, Prophet of Allah cursed you while you were in your father's loins!

Imam Hussain (as) dear readers is saying that Prophet Muhammed (saws) cursed whom? Marwaan whilst he was in his father's loins! So Prophet Muhammed (saws) knew what kind of a person this man was, and what he will be! These are questions to be asked, and questions to be answered dear viewers!

The investigator of this book is Abdul-Qadir Abd-il-Aziz jawandal, who says:

This Hadeeth is Saheeh, as per the narrators within this chain of narration, are all trustworthy and authentic! And this has been mentioned by
  • Al Haythami
  • Busairi
  • And is written by Abu Yo'la
  • Ibn Katheer
etc...

Dear viewers, what else would you want? These are questions to be asked, and questions to be answered!... (I just love saying that).

Swear to God that Prophet cursed Banu Ummayah” - Yes, somone did swear to God;

We read in Tareekh-ul-Islam wa Wafiat Al-Mashaheer wal-A'laam by Imam Dhahabi. Book edited by Br Bashar Awaad Ma'roof Al-Gharb Al-Islami Institution. The one which I'm referring to you is from the 3rd Edition published in 2003. In Vol. 2, page 200 of this book, we read:

Al-Shay'bi said: I heard Ibn Zubair say: I swear by Lord of this house (Ka'ba), that verily Al-Hakam ibn Abil-Aas and his sons are cursed by the tongue of Prophet Muhammed (saws)!

Pay close attention to the footnote of this hadeeth, Dhahabi says it is Saheeh, all the narrators in this chain are authentic! Dear readers, that was a brief covering of the greatest era, as primarily due to the fact that Prophet Muhammed (saws) lived in it, and that Prophet of Allah, cursed Marwaan Ibn Hakam from his own tongue, and also Banu Ummayah and their sons! He cursed the most evil clan in Hejaz, if not, the world! He cursed what deserved to be. Another question arriving is that Banu Ummayah included Mu'awiah, and in the previous articles I published (which you can get the link from below), have examined his character, and clearly have stated (the books of Ahl-e-Sunnah), what kind of a person he was, and Prophet (saws) even went on to order his killing if he is seen upon my pulpit!

There are thousands of ore evidences for Mu'awiah and Banu Ummayah's character examination providing the family of Kufr. In fact, we even have some ahadith, which claim Mu'awiah being announced as the enemy of Islam, by Prophet Muhammed (saws) himself. And I don't see why conversion to a different faith seems a good idea after all.

As mentioned, my intention isn't to harm any view of any faith with rude, stupid and a foolish way, but in fact guide and bring people to the path of Mukhlasin and provide even more info of the religion, so pagans aren't existing tampering it.

2 sentenced Conclusion:

O Allah, forgive us all for our bad sins...
__________________________________Can you “actually” Handle the truth?

Link to Mu'awiah and some more devastating facts you didn't know: http://www.scribd.com/doc/139718487/Mu-awiah-and-some-more-devastating-facts