Sunday 21 April 2013

What Imam Ali said about Abu Bakr's Caliphate

لَمْ تَكُنْ بَيْعَتُكُمْ إِيَّايَ فَلْتَةً (1) ، وَلَيْسَ أَمْرِي وَأَمْرُكُمْ وَاحِداً. إِنِّي أُرِيدُكُمْ لِلَّهِِ وَأَنْتُمْ تُرِيدُونَنِي لِأَنْفُسِكُمْ.
أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ، أَعِينُوني عَلى أَنْفُسِكُمْ، وَايْمُ اللهِ لَأٌنْصِفَنَّ الْمَظْلُومَ، مِنْ ظَالِمِهِ, وَلَأَقُودَنَّ الظَّالِمَ بِخِزَامَتِهِ  حَتَّى أُورِدَهُ مَنْهَلَ الْحَقِّ وَإِنْ كَانَ كَارِهاً.

Your allegiance to me was not without thinking (2) nor is my and your position the same. I seek you for Allah's sake but you seek me for your own benefits. O' people! support me despite your heart's desires. By Allah I will take revenge for the oppressed from the oppressor and will put a string in the nose of the oppressor and drag him to the spring of truthfulness even though he may grudge it.
__________________________________________
Here Amir almu'minin points to the view of 'Umar ibn al-Khattab which he had on the allegiance of Abu Bakr on the day of Saqifah when he said: " . . . let me clarify this to you that the allegiance with Abu Bakr was a mistake and without thinking (faltah) but Allah saved us from its evil. Therefore whoever (intends to) acts like this you must kill him. . ." (as-Sahih al-Bukhari vol. 8 p. 211; as-Sirah an-Nabawiyyah Ibn Hisham vol. 4 pp. 308309; at-Tarikh at-Tabari vol. l p. l822; al-Kamil Ibn al-Athir vol. 2 p. 327; at-Tarikh Ibn Kathir vol. 5 pp. 245246; al-Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal vol. l p. 55; as-Sirah al-Halabiyyah vol. 3 pp. 388 392; al-Ansab al-Baladhuri vol. 5 p. l5; at-Tamhid al-Baqilani p. l96; ash-Sharh Ibn Abi'l-Hadid vol. 2 p. 23)

  • Nahjul Balagha Sermon 135, as per the booking of Ansariyaan Publications. 

Saturday 20 April 2013

Imam Ali did not offer prayer under the ‘Imamate’ of Abu Bakar rather he prayed ‘on his own’

Imam Ali (as) praying behind a sinner or a person who has the same Eiman as Iblis, is a sight impossible. It can never be this, only a sinner himself can imagine this hatred event become a reality. In this article, I hope to clear the misconceptions of Imam Ali (as)'s allegience to Abu Bakr and also he not praying behind his Imamate in the Masjid.

In this regard, we do find a Mursal narration by Allamah Tabrasi (page 166) from Hamad ibn Uthman, that is devoid of any chain. A chain can however be located in Tafsir al- Qummi, Volume 2 page 155-159. As it is a rather lengthy narration, we have hence sought to quote only the salient features, and then discuss the point that is presented therein.

The narration states:
1-    Abu Bakar relieved the representative of Lady Fatima (as) from Fadak
2-    Sayyida Fatima (as) was annoyed by this, and approached Abu Bakar  in order to take back her property.
3-    Abu Bakar  asked for witnesses.
4-    Sayyida Fatima (as) presented Umm Aiman (ra) and Maula Ali (as) as her witnesses.
5-    Abu Bakar drafted a letter.
6-    Umar ripped up the letter; that led toFatima(as) feeling aggrieved.
7-    Maula Ali (as) objected to this act in the presence of Abu Bakar and  other companions.
8-    Abu Bakar  said that it was war booty, and ifFatima(as) was to present witnesses, she would acquire possession of it (despite her having already done so previously).
9-    Maula Ali (as) proved to Abu Bakar that the onus was on him to produce witnesses.
10-  Abu Bakar  had no answer.
11-   Umar said that we do not have the powers to debate, so he should prove it .
12-   Upon this, Maula Ali (as) submitted evidence.
13-    People were receptive to the evidence presented by Ali (as).
14-    When Ali (as) did not get any positive response, he returned.
15-   Fatima(as) went to the grave of the Prophet (s) and recited a sad elegy.
16-  Abu Bakar  told Umar that if Ali (as) continues to conduct himself in this manner, they would not survive for long
17-    Umar told him to kill Ali (as) via Khalid bin Waleed.
18-   Abu Bakar  told Khalid to sit beside Ali (as), and kill him when he concluded his prayers.
19-  Asma acquired receipt of this and notified Ali (as).
20-  Ali (as) replied that Allah (swt) would not grant them success.
And then we find the narration:-
 ۔۔۔ وحضر المسجد ووقف خلف ابى بكر وصلى لنفسه وخالد بن الوليد إلى جنبه ومعه السيف فلما ۔۔۔
 Ali (as) entered the mosque, and got behind Abu Bakr, and started offering his prayers alone (Waa Sala le Nafsihi); whilst Khalid sat beside him, carrying a sword. Upon his completing the tashahud, Abu Bakar  felt ashamed and was fearful of the repercussions that might flow from this, he hence turned to Khalid and told him not implement his instructions, and then proceeded to the final salutation. Ali (as) then inquired of him (Khalid) the order that he had been given, to which he (Khalid) replied that I was told to kill you. Ali (as) asked him would you have done that? He said that if I was not stopped, by God! I would have done it. Ali (as) held him up and threw him down; people began to swear “By Allah, Ali will kill Khalid”. They therefore approached Ali, and asked that he forgive him for the sake of Allah (swt) and the individual in his grave (i.e. the Prophet [s]). Ali (as) therefore left him, and grabbed Umar by the neck and told him “O son of dahak! Had there been no will of the Prophet and the Book of Allah (swt), you would have known today who is weak and who is not”
The entire narration has been placed before  our readers, we would hence invite you to read it carefully and judge for yourself as to whether Ali bin Abi Talib (as) offered his prayer behind the Imamate of Abu Bakar  or whether he (as) offered it on his own? Rather than corroborating the Nawasib stance, this tradition renders the entire Nasibi argument superfluous and poses a direct question the need arose for Ali bin Abi Talib (as) not to offer his prayers under the Imamate of Abu Bakar  whilst praying ‘behind’ him?

Does offering Salat behind a person means that he is superior or eligible for caliphate ?


The main word that has been used in the tradition and that led the Nawasib to rejoice is the word ‘Khalaf’ i.e. behind. We read in Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 89, Number 287:
Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:
Salim, the freed salve of Abu Hudhaifa used to lead in prayer the early Muhajirin (emigrants) and the companions of the Prophet in the Quba mosque. Among those (who used to pray behind him) were Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, Abu Salama, and Amir bin Rabi’a.
Now, if one applies Nasibi logic, namely offering Salat behind a person evidences that individuals right to be Khalifa, then Salim had the right to be the first Khalifa at the hem of the state following the death of the Prophet (s).
It is similarly written by Ibn Abi Sheybah in his al-Musanaf, vol 3, page 319, Hadeeth 2 as well as in Sunan al-Behaqi, Volume 3 page 12 that Imam Hasan and Imam Hussain offered prayers behind Marwan:
 حدثنا حاتم بن إسماعيل عن جعفر عن أبيه قال كان الحسن بن علي والحسين يصليان خلف مروان قال فقيل له أما كان أبوك يصلي إذا رجع إلى البيت قال فيقول لا والله ما كانوا يزيدون على صلاة الأئمة .
 Ja’far, from his father who said: Al-Hassan and Al-Hussein prayed behind Marwan. It was said to him: Did they pray when they returned to their house? He said: No, by Allah, they did not add to the prayer of the Imaams.
And who was this Marwan? Al Muhaddith Shah Abdul Aziz stated in Tauhfa Ithna Ashari:
 
“Hadith narrated by Marwan can be found in al Bukhari, even though he was a Nasibi, in fact he was leader of that wicked cult.”
Based on the Nasibi logic, are they willing to claim that a Nasibi was greater in status than the chiefs of paradise? And if this does not affect the status of Imam Hasan and Imam Hussein, why does the word ‘khalaf’  affect status of Imam Ali (as)?
The onus remains on Sunnis to prove that he offered his Salat under the IMAMAT of Abu Bakr.
If praying behind a person is proof of Khilafath, then the Ahl’ul Sunnah should know that Umar throughout his Khilafath offered Salat behind Ubayy bin Kab but he never even short listed him for Khilafath by placing him on the six-men Shura committee set up to appoint a successor.
Most interestingly in Muwatta Imam Malik Book 2, Number 2.8.42 under the chapter “Wiping over Leather Socks” we find a tradition wherein Rasulullah (s) actually prayed behind the Sahabi Abdur Rahman:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Abbad ibn Ziyad, a descendant of al-Mughira ibn Shuba from his father from al Mughira ibn Shuba that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, went to relieve himself during the expedition of Tabuk. Mughira said, “I went with him, taking water. Then the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, came back and I poured out the water for him. He washed his hands and then went to push his hands out of the sleeves of his garment, but could not do so because of their narrowness. So he brought them out from underneath his garment. Then he washed his arms, wiped his head and wiped over his leather socks. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, returned and Abdar Rahman ibn Awf was leading the people in prayer, and he had already finished one raka with them. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, prayed the remaining raka with them to everyone’s concern. When the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, finished he said, ‘You have acted correctly.’ ”
If leading prayers is a proof of or is an individual’s right to Khilafah then why did Rasulullah (s) not appoint the man who as per the abovementioned Sunni tradition he (as) was praying behind?
Interestingly, in Sahih Bukhari there are two chapters that contain the words ‘khalaf’ and that too with respect to ‘praying behind’ an individual. We read in Sahih Bukhari English translation, Volume 1, Book 9 Chapter 14:
“Praying behind a sleeping person”Sahih Bukhari English translation, Volume 1, Book 9 Chapter 14
and
“To pray Nawafil behind a sleeping woman”Sahih Bukhari English translation, Volume 1, Book 9 Chapter 15
Sunni Fiqh deems it permissible to pray behind a sinner

It is strange that Nawasib are trying to argue that praying behind Abu Bakar meant that Ali bin Abi Talib (as) held Abu Bakar in high esteem when the very jurisprudence that they ascribe to, has no qualms with an individual praying  behind a sinner. Mulla Ali Qari states:
“It is permissible to offer prayers behind a pious person or a sinner” Sharah Fiqh Akbar, page 416
do we need anything further on the matter?

Sunday 14 April 2013

A blasphemous move by Umer after Fatima (s)'s martyrdom

Madar e Hussain a.s
On p. 136 of Dalaa’il al-Imama دلائل الامامة, we are told that those who attended Fatima’s burial in the darkness of the night were, besides her husband Ali (ع), none other than both her sons al-Hassan and al-Hussain (ع), her daughters Zainab and Umm Kulthum, her maid Fidda and Asmaa daughter of Umays. The author, as quoted on p. 92, Vol. 10 of the newly published edition of Bihar al-Anwar, adds the following

In the morning of the eve in which she (Fatima) was buried, al-Baqi’ was found to have forty new graves. When the Muslims came to know about her death, they went to al-Baqi’ where they found forty freshly built graves, so they were confused and could not identify her grave from among all of them. People fussed and blamed each other. They said, “Your Prophet left only one daughter among you. She dies and is buried while you do not attend her demise or perform the prayers for her or even know where her grave is.”
Those in authority among them said, “Bring from among the Muslims’ women those who would inter these graves till we find her, perform the prayers for her and visit her grave.” The report reached the Commander of the Faithful, Allah’s blessings with him, so he came out furious, his eyes reddened, his veins swollen and wearing his yellow outer garment which he always put on whenever there was trouble, leaning on his sword, Thul-Fiqar, till he reached al-Baqi’. A Warner rushed to people to warn them saying, “Here is Ali ibn Abu Talib has come as you can see, swearing by Allah that if anyone moves a brick of these graves, he will kill each and every one of them.”
He was met by ‘Umar [ibn al-Khattab] and some of his companions and said, “What is wrong with you, O father of al-Hassan?! By Allah, we shall inter her grave, and we shall perform the [funeral] prayers for her.” Ali (ع) took hold of ‘Umar’s garment, shook him and threw him on the ground and said, “O son of the black woman! As regarding my right [to succeed the Prophet as the caliph], I have abandoned it for fear people might revert from their religion. As for Fatima’s grave, I swear by the One Who holds Ali’s soul in His hands that if you and your fellows want to do any such thing, I shall let the earth drink of your blood, all of you; so, if you want, stay away from it, O ‘Umar.”
Abu Bakr met him and said, “O father of al-Hassan! By the right of the Messenger of Allah (ص) and by the right of the One on the Arsh, leave him, for we shall not do anything which you dislike.” Ali (ع) left ‘Umar alone. People dispersed and did not make any further attempt. This incident shows the reader how Abu Bakr was blessed with a higher degree of wisdom than ‘Umar.
Following are verses of poetry in honor of Fatima, Head of the Women of Mankind, composed by the late Shaikh Muhsin Abu al-Hubb Senior presented to all ladies who descended from Fatima:
When they mention Eve, I say that Fatima is her pride,
Or if Mary is mentioned, I say that Fatima is superior.
Can anyone underestimate a father such as Muhammad?
Or does Mary have a lion cub more brave than Fatima’s?
Each had a status at her birth that puzzles sages’ minds:
This to her date tree resorted, so of fresh ripe dates she ate,
Giving birth to Jesus without fright, how so when the guard
Is the most brave night sojourner?
And to the wall and the door’s slab did this resort,
Prophet’s daughter, so she aborted what she was bearing.
She fell, and her fetus [Muhsin] fell with her, surrounded by
Every one of a mean descent and lowly birth:
This rogue rebukes her, that one reprimands her,
This one dismisses her, that one even kicks her…
Though before her was the lion of lions being led
By the rope…, so, is there a greater calamity?
Fatima will come on the Judgment Day to complain
To the Lord of the Heavens, and she will wail,
And you will know who her fetus was, why she wails
Why she presents a complaint from which the heavens shake:
“Lord! My inheritance and my husband’s right did they confiscate
“And, moreover, all my sons did they kill, O Lord!”
Here is a poem composed by the Christian poet Abdul-Maseeh al-Antaki (of Antioch city) in praise of Fatima al-Zahra (ع), for those who agree with our [religious] views and those who do not have all testified to Fatima’s distinction: She is the Mistress of all Women of Mankind from the early generations to the very last:
Among women, hers is a unique birth:
No other daughter of Eve comes to her distinctions close.
One from whose forehead the sun’s rays shine,
From her standing places glitter glows.
She is the peer of the honored one and only who
In his feats and supreme honors is her only match.
Arabs seek competent peers for daughters to marry
A tradition which they refuse to forgo.
Any marriage without a competent peer they regard
As a shame on them that debases them among peers.
Who can match in lineage the daughter of the Chosen one?
Who among the Arabs in honors matches her?
Who suits Taha (ص) to be his son-in-law,
A marriage tie that brings happiness to one who wins it
Other than Ali, the one loved by the Chosen One?
He accepted Guidance since the Messenger called for it.
Next to the Chosen One, he is the best of Quraish
Since the Almighty created its souls.
And he is the hero of Islam well known
By those wars that raised his status.

Wednesday 10 April 2013

Hanafi sect exposed, part 1 - Raees Mustafa


Exposing the Hanafi sect, Sunni religion include different sub sects, all of them have a different Imam, Imam Abu Hanifa, is the most famous Imam out of the 4, as he has the most followers, exposing him through other Imams of other sub sects Sunni Imams...

Raees Mustafa in this video, publicly exposes these lies, with research and knowledge, and shows, why we Shias, don't convert as to not only the deviating beliefs, but also due to the disgusting conflicts and stupidity which lies in the religion's sub sect.

I hope this video would be helpful, and knock doors on the Eiman... Insh'allah, other parts will also come, and continue upon exposing this sect. As promised, a detailed post regarding the mentioning in the video, of the books, will be presented and referred with authority...

Friday 5 April 2013

Umer's Bid'at ends up in the Fajr's Adhaan

[This was the direct article available here on the new blog, of Raees Mustafa, providing viewers a better opportunity, to just see exactly how much of a liar Umer was, and his Bid'at]



                       


Salah is better than sleep”


Article By: Raees Mustafa












1
Introduction

Shias and Sunnis have many differences that are speculated carefully, whether that be the Wilayat of Ali, or the Prostration upon Earth, we just can't sit down and come to a decision together. Or is it? To be honest, it's more of gaining knowledge, than abusing and exposing someone, and Shias try their best not to be rude in that way, or become a total out-cast of that exposing example. Shias and Sunnis have different views to numerous topics, regarding Salah and of course its rules and regulations.

What this article looks to cover is the very famous and mischivious topic of the phrase:
Salah is better than sleep”

Which was said by Hazrat Umer to a man whom came to wake him up for the Salah of Fajr, Hazrat Umer was sleeping, as mentioned, and the person came forward to say the above phrase: Assalatu Khayrum-min-Al-Naum – Salah is better than sleep.

When Hazrat Umer heard him and woke up, he ordered the person to add this into the Adhaan (and per some narrations) into the Salah itself.

This is regarded as Bid'at, not from my words, but from the words of Imam Malik, Imam Shaf'i, and Ali Mutaqi Hindi, whom are regarded as some of the pillars of the Sunni School of thought, and are respected from head to toe... It's not our fault they quote Hazrat Umer's began Bid'at, and also it's not our fault, that they mention this, yet nowadays Sunni Muftis deny that with such rudness...

Nonetheless, by the will of Allah, I've produced an article on this topic, and its confussions, with a great amount of Sunni books, and have also reported this attribution to the one of a Bid'ati, not from my words, but from Hazrat Umer's own son's. It's up to you to now take that piece of knowledge, and see for yourself, who'se right and who's wrong...


2
Sunni references

Mota of Imam Malik, Vol. 1, page 90 (Published from Karachi) states:

Imam Malik has told that to him this talk reached, that a person came to Hazrat Umer, to inform him the Salah of fajr's time is here. The person saw that Hazrat Umer was sleeping, and went closer to him to say: Salah is better than sleep.

Hazrat Umer in reply said: Add that phrase: Salah is better than sleep in the Adhaan. So as I'm sleeping, others sleeping will also wake up.

Tanweer-ul-Mumajad, Alaa Mota Imam Muhammed page 36

Molana Ataa-ullah, who was the student of Molana Muhammed Hussain Muhadis, has translated this in urdu, and has analysed it as well. He has written this narration:

A person came to Hazrat Umer, he was sleeping, and said: Salah is better than sleep, Hazrat Umer informed him to add this into Adhaan.

It further states: Some people say that and also say: Hayya Alaa Khyaril Amal, Molana Ata'ullah writes, Hayya Alaa Khyaril Amal to be added in Azaan is Sunnat-e-Muhammed (saws).(1)

Further states:

It's Abullah Ibn Umer's call, that it's Sunnat to add it in Adhaan (Hayya Alaa Khayril Amal), though some don't believe it that he done it from Sunnat-e-Muhammed, but it's quite clear, that he read it, and may have read it most certainly from the intention of that being the Sunnat of the Prophet (saws). So to act upon that, there is no problem!

He has mentioned Mota Imam Malik's version of this incident, though hasn't commented anything upon that...

All Hanafi Ulama never ever deny the above book, of Muhammed bin Hassan Shibani, and say he is 100% authentic.

Gami'il Usool Min Ahadith-r-rasool, Vol. 6, page: 197, book By Ibn Atheer Gadri, also refers to Mota Imam Malik, but he never commented anything about its narration.

This also states clearly, the very same narration, that a person came to Hazrat Umer, and asked him to pray the Fajr, he was sleeping, and heard the person said: Salah is better than sleep, Umer in reply said: Add this phrase in the Adhaan.

Sharh of Mota Imam Malik, called Tanweer-ul-Haqaaliq – Sharh gul-Imam Malik.
Sharh-ho-huu Tanweer-ul-Haqaaliq, Mota Imam Malik.
Motal Imam-e-Malik's Sharh, authored by Allama Jallaludin Sayuti, Vol.1 page: 70

3
____________________________
  1. Molana Ata'ullah has written in his book, that reciting Hayya Alaa Khayril Amal in the Adhaan in Sunnat-e-Muhammed, and how Shias read is absolutely correct accordingly to the true Sunnah, and your own authentic book!

Imam Jallaludin says the same incident from Mota Imam Malik, but doesn't comment on it, as this is the Sharh, of the whole book. Nonetheless, he also says, that once a person was reading Adhaan in Syria, when Mu'awiah entered, and, within the adhaan that person says: Assalamu Alayka Yaa Ameer. As in adressing to Mu'awiah.

Imam Sayuti writes, this Bid'at began during the times of Mu'awiah.

If someone can send salaam upon such a person, can't we give salaams in the Adhaan upon the greatest personality after Prophet Muhammed (saws), Ali? Yes we can, and we have every write to do so... (2)

On this page he writes the same incident, but doesn't refer to or mention or comment on Imam Malik's narration.

Another Sharh of Mota Imam Malik, Sharh Zarqani, a very famous Sharh of Mota Imam Malik, he is the Imam of Ahl-e-Sunnat, page 221, has mentioned the same version of the incident, of Mota Imam Malik, he has reffered to the version of the incident in Mota Imam Malik, but hasn't said this is Zaeef. And says: In reality, it was Hazrat Umer, who began this work of adding: Salah is better than Sleep in the Adhaan.

Seerat Ibn Halbiyah e Ali Ibn Burahanuddin Halbiy, Vol. 2, page 96;

On this page he mentions the very same version of the incident, but didn't comment on it or refer it (to Mota Imam Malik's). And he mentions this with authority, that it was Hazrat Umer, who began the addition of: Salah is better than Sleep, in the Adhaan of Fajr.

Another Sharh of Mota Imam Malik, Mussafa Mussawa Sharh-a-Mota. And this is the best Sharh of Mota Imam Malik. On its cover says: Hujjatullah hay Alal Alameen Shah Waliyullah Muhadis Dhelvi.(3)

Shah Walyullah Muhadis Dhelvi, has reffered to Mota Imam Malik, and says: a person came to Hazrat Umer, and said: It's time for Namaz. Hazrat Umer was sleeping, so he went closer and said: Salah is better than sleep. Hazrat Umer said: Add this into the Adhaan.

He writes further:

Therefore, it's mustahab, to add this phrase: Namaz is better than sleep, in the Adhaan, twice.

He then analysis Mota Imam Malik's view, and also his own, that it was Hazrat Umer, the first person, to state this, and make this an addition into the Adhaan.

Allah's Hujjat, upon all the worlds, says that Hazrat Umer added this in the Adhaan, now shall we listen to these housemade Alims, or from him? As the front cover of the book states?
4
Another Sharh of Mota Imam Malik, Aujazul-Masaalik Ilaa Mota Malik, this book is written by Shaykh-ul-Hadees, Molana Muhammed Zakariya Mohajir Madani, Vol. 1, page 192
____________________________
  1. Inshallah- I will produce an article where I ptove the Imamate of Imam Ali (as) from Quran, and also Sunni Tafaseer, that it's wajib!
  2. Such titles are Haram for Non-Ma'sum, and certainly will be punsihed in the hereafter...
He writes the reference of Mota Imam Malik, and says clearly, it was him (Umer) who started this Bid'at. And then writes something very interesting, Mohajir Madani writes:

The Adhaan which came, revealed from the Sky was different, and didn't include the phrase: Salah is better than sleep. But this came afterwards, later, and as early morning, is the time to pray, and some sleep, some Sahaba denied this Bid'at! And said Prophet Muhammed (saws) never ever recited this! This is Bid'at!

Mohajir Madani further writes:

It's well known from Imam Ali (as), and also from Hazrat Tawoos, that this phrase, and its addition into the Adhaan is falsehood and came later.

And this incident is also mentioned by Imam Shaukaani in his book Nehlul Autar with detail.

This is on the page 192 of the book Aujazul-Masaalik, mentioning the reference of Imam Shaukani's book too... That the Adhaan, which came from the sky, wasn't or didn't icnlude this.

Another absolute gem of a Sharh of Mota Imam Malik, written by Molana Ishfaq-ur-Rahman Kandelvi Deobandi

The author is a Hanafi Scholar, and in his book on page 57 has narrated an inch perfect incident of Hazrat Umer's encounter with this man, and says clearly, that Hazrat Umer's adittioned Adhaan, with the phrase: Salah is better than sleep, is absolutely wrong, and certainly isn't the Adhaan the same which was revealed from the sky, but tampered!

Al-Farooq, Shibli Nu'mani's book, Urdu publication, on page: 372 and 373 states:

Hazrat Umer's character from head to toe, what he done, how he did it, why he did it, when, was he born, every question, every speck of Hazrat Umer is covered over here in this Sunni Scholar's book. And within it, it states:

Islam never allowed 45 such things, the true Islam, but Hazrat Umer gave permission to do so, and practised it himself...!

And within those 45 wrong additions, there is one which Shibli Bu'mani states: that Hazrat Umer was the first person to give himself, and start this title: Amir Al-Mu'mineen.

Though Hazrat Abu Bakr didn't even use this title for himself...

He Shibli Nu'mani writes that Hazrat Umer done lots of work, situated Prisons, used the whipping rope, situated and organised a Police station/departement,
5
examined and signified the Usool of Qiyaas, Bajama'at-e-Namaz-e-Taraawi was formed, made it certain for 4 Takbeer's recitation at Namaz-e-Janaazah on people.

And writes one more thing: added the phrase: Salah is better than sleep in the Fajr's Adhaan!

We talked nothing from our view, absolutely nothing... And it's not up to us either to talk, as by Allah, it's the books talking these rules and regulations, false ones, formed by Hazrat Umer, not accordingly to the will of Allah... These are your books everyone!

Sunan-e-Dar Kutani, book of Dar Kutani, Vol. 1, page: 243, hadees no. 39:

He writes the narration from Anas, but doesn't take it in 100% authentic, nonetheless, that doesn't really matter, as he the author of this book mentions on this page, that when a person came unto Hazrat Umer to wake him up for Fajr prayers, he (Umer) was sleeping, and that person came forward and said to him: Salah is better than sleep.

On behalf of that, Hazrat Umer replied: Add that into the Fajr's Adhaan...

This was another reference from another Sunni Alim, very well known in their School of thought, and even he approves, that Hazrat Umer, added the phrase: Salah is better than sleep into the Fajr's Adhaan.

This referring incident, is narrated differently from Imam Malik's Mota, though at the end, comes to the cocnlusion, that really, Umer did add the phrase.

So far I've presented several books, and all of them claim clearly, that this phrase added by Hazrat Umer into the Fajr's Adhaan, is Bid'at!

Kenzul Ammal, book of Hadith, every Sunni brother approves this book, and all Hanafi Scholars approve it with authenticity.

Kenzul Ammal Fiy Sunan-e-Lakwaal, written by Allama Ali Mutaqi Hindi

He also mentions in his famous book, that Hazrat Umer did reply to the person who said to him: Salah is better than sleep, to add this phrase into the Fajr's Adhaan.

First reference from the book, Hadees No. 23250, it states:

It's a narration from Mujahid;

I was with the son of Umer, Abdullah bn Umer, we entered the Mosque, and a person was giving the Adhaan, the person giving the Adhaan said the phrase:
Salah is better than sleep

6
After hearing this, Hazrat Umer's son says: Take this Bid'at and this Bidati (person performing the Bid'at) out of the Mosque!!!

Because the Prophet Muhammed (saws) never added this into the Adhaan, via the will of Alah, he's performing such an act, which is not liked by Allah and his rasool! Take him out of the Mosque!

Now those who say that it was the granted permission and order by Prophet Muhammed (saws) to add the phrase: Salah is better than sleep in the Adhaan, are they more knowledgeble than Hazrat Umer's son? The most authentic personality in the School of Sunnism, for narrating Ahadith?

Al-Hidaday'h, page: 84, this book is written by Ahl-e-Sunnat wal-Jammat's Alim, Allama Murghi Naani. This is the book of Fiqh. Even he writes the narration in his book, he says:

Imam Ali (as) saw a man who was reciting the phrase: Salah is better than sleep. Imam Ali (as) on behalf of witnessing that said: Take this Bid'ati (person performing Bid'at) out of the Mosque!

Abdullah bn Umer said take such a person doing such a Bid'at out of the Mosque, and so did Imam Ali (as).

Second reference from Kenzul Ammal, Hadees no. 23291

It's a related from Ibn Jurrair, that Hassan bn Muslim gave me news of a person, who asked Hazrat Tawoos that when was the phrase: Salah is better than sleep, said in the Adhaan?

Hazrat Tawoos in reply said: By Allah, this phrase: Salah is better than sleep, was never ever said during the time of Prophet Muhammed (saws).

Third reference from Kenzul Ammal, this is also related from Ibn Jurrair, Hadees No. 2352;

It states that the person who came to inform Hazrat Umer of Salatul-Fajr, was Saad, and when he recited this in the Adhaan, Hazrat Umer himself said it, that it was Bid'at!!!

Now Hazrat Umer according to Sunni School of thought is Farooq-e-Azam, isn't he? Shall we listen to these nowadays Muftis, or Hazrat Umer himself, that adding the phrase: Salah is better than sleep in the Adhaan, or after the Adhaan is Bid'at or not?

Another Sunni book: Mazahir-e-Haqq, translation of Mishqaat Sharif, translated by Allama Qutubudin Khan Kalvi, page No: 586

It has got the very same narration related in Kenzul Ammal, and other books, that Imam Ali (as) and Abdullah bn Umer said it himself, that whoever recited this in his Adhaan in the mosque, take him out of the Mosque, he is a Bid'ati!

Improtant to note here is that in Mishqaat Sharif, has also mentioned that: Hazrat Abu Mahzura, said that the Prophet (saws) did order to add this phrase in the
7
Adhaan. It's important to note this, even though many more books of much higher stature deny this, those Sunni brothers will now and then come with this book to regard their view correct.

The thing is that people don't even know properly who he is, and what people have done to his narration, what is its true reality... Abu Mahzura's narration is annalysed by the author of Mishqat Sharif from the book Sunan-e- Abu-Dawood, people say there are 2 such narrations of Abu Mahzura, regarding the Prophet's order of adding this phrase into the Adhaan.

Now lets cover both of these narrations from Abu Mahzura.
First narration from Sunan-e-Dawwod, Hadees no. 500.

It states this narration from Abu Mahzura. And approves the fact that Prophet Muhammed (saws) did order to add the phrase: Salah is better than sleep in the Adhaan.

But I don't agree... (As usual)

Though lets not forget Mota Imam Malik, Imam Malik died in 150-70 (A.H), and Abu Dawood died in the 200s. Who shall we trust? The more famous book, or the less famous one? The early published one or the later one? The more elevated book or the lesser elevated one?

The person coming 100 years later says and claims that Prophet Muhammed (saws) ordered Abu Mahzura to recite this phrase: Salah is better than sleep, in the Adhaan?

What Blasphemy?

Nehlul-Autaar, book of Sunni School of thought, book of Imam Shaukani, now he died in the year 1200 (A.H), he on the page: 246 has written about the narration of Abu Mahzura:

Abu Mahzura's narration, which is recorded in Sunan-e-Abu Dawood, its reality is that within this narration recorded in Sunan-e-Abu Dawood, its sanad contains a relator called Muhammed bn Abdul Malik bn Abu Mahzura, no one in this world knows about this man, who was he, where he came from, no one knows of him...

Secondly Imam Shaukani writes:

There is another relator called Haris bn Ubaid, and many people say no one should trust him, as he lies...

Now this narration recorded in Sunan-e-Abu Dawood saying that Prophet Muhammed (saws) ordered people to recite the phrase: Salah is better than sleep, in the Adhaan, is wrong, may be written in the book, and is, there is no doubt about the book relating this incident, but its relators of the ahadith narrated by Abu Mahzura, isn't reliable, according to their own books!

Another relator is Abu Mahzura himself, and another person relating this event is Muhaddis, about him dozens of Sunni Alims and books narrate, that he was a lazy person, so his talk and information, isn't reliable... (writes Allama Shaukani in his book)

Now those reporting in return, the narration from Rasool-ul-Allah regarding the addition of this
8
phrase into the Adhaan as fine and obligatory, how comes the Sanad and the relators of this hadith narrated by Abu Mahzura from Prophet Muhammed (saws), are reported weak and lazy, from Sunni books?

There were 2 places quoting Abu Mahzura's hadith from Prophet (saws) about this phrase's addition into the Adhaan, but it turned out quite happily, that 3 of the people narrating this, were weak, and aren't to be trusted.

The second place where this even is mentioned, is the very next hadith in Sunan-e-Abu Dawood, Hadees 501 quoting this incident from Abu Mahzura's hadith from Prophet Muhammed (saws), is also mentioned as weak.
Sunan-naul Kubra, book of Imam Nasayi, Imam Nasyi died in 303 (A.H), Vol. 1, page: 499 says about the relators of Abu Mahzura's hadith from Prophet Muhammed (saws):

The whole of incident of Prophet Muhammed (saws) ordering Abu Mahzura to read this phrase: Salah is better than Salah, in the Adhaan, is weak, in fact this hadith contains a relator called Uthmaan bn Saib, him and his father are totally unreliable!......

So tell me now, would you trust Sunan-e-Abu Dawood quoting Abu Mahzura's fake hadith from Prophet Muhammed (saws) saying: Recite the phrase: Salah is better than sleep, in the Adhaan, or the Saheeh, authentic and reliable books of much elevated Sunni Alims, and the good Hassan narrators?

It's up to you to decide...

Now this is a gem of a reference, from a Sunni book, Kitabul Umm, written By Imam Shaf'i, he died in the year 204 (A.H), Vol. 1, page: 55, he writes:

I don't like the addition of the phrase: Salah is better than sleep, in the Adhaan!!!!!!!! And Abu Mahzura's Adhaan didn't include the phrase: Salah is better than sleep, in his Adhaan!!!!!!!! I say this with the witnessing of Allah recording this! And I neither like this after the Salah.

Another book: Bidayat-ul-Mujtahid wa Nihayat-ul-Muqtasid, written by Allama Ibn Rushd Qurtubi, Sunni Alim! Vol. 1, page: 77, he died in the year, 593 (A.H), and has written in his book:

You shouldn't say: Salah is better than sleep in the Adhaan! Because this phrase, is not from the natural Adhaan revealed by Allah! The Salah Prophet Muhammed (saws) taught didn't include this phrase: Salah is better than sleep. And neither did its Adhaan taught by Prophet (saws) conatin this phrase...! I'm not saying this, but Imam Shafa'i is! In this topic, I will go with Imam Shaf'i, that adding the phrase:
Salah is better than sleep

is Bid'at from head to toe!

9
The author further writes on the same page:

The confusion and bemusion of reciting this came upon due to the fact that Prophet Muhammed (saws) never recited this in his Adhaan or the Prayers, but Hazrat Umer gave permission, and ordered it...

Conclusion

There my brothers and sisters were dozens and dozens of references, not from me, but from your Sheikhs, your Imams! They aren't me quoting, and it's quite clear, after all that research, that really, Hazrat Umer performed this Bid'at first, and said it afterwards, that don't recite this, it's Bid'at, I appologise, yet we see our Sunni brothers not addmiting it's a Bid'at, given birth by Hazrat Umer himself...

Not to only note that, but also the fact that adding Hayyala Khayril Amal in the Adhaan, isn't Bid'at, likewise the addition of Hazrat Umer, and that's a point to note, as we Shias, recite this in our Adhaan with great repute and pleasure, as it's a Sunnat, performed by your great Ahadith narrator, and also, orriginally Sunnat-e-Muhammed!



Allah, forgive us all, for our bad sins...

Aliyun Wali Allah in the Holy Quran (References)

Ayat 1

وَإِذۡ أَخَذَ رَبُّكَ مِنۢ بَنِىٓ ءَادَمَ مِن ظُهُورِهِمۡ ذُرِّيَّتَہُمۡ وَأَشۡہَدَهُمۡ عَلَىٰٓ أَنفُسِہِمۡ أَلَسۡتُ بِرَبِّكُمۡ‌ۖ قَالُواْ بَلَىٰ‌ۛ شَهِدۡنَآ‌ۛ أَن تَقُولُواْ يَوۡمَ ٱلۡقِيَـٰمَةِ إِنَّا ڪُنَّا عَنۡ هَـٰذَا غَـٰفِلِينَ (١٧٢


[Picthal 7:172]: And (remember) when thy Lord brought forth from the Children of Adam, from their reins, their seed, and made them testify of themselves, (saying): Am I not your Lord? They said: Yea, verily. We testify. (That was) lest ye should say at the Day of Resurrection: Lo! of this we were unaware; (172)

[Shakir 7:172]: And when your Lord brought forth from the children of Adam, from their backs, their descendants, and made them bear witness against their own souls: Am I not your Lord? They said: Yes! we bear witness. Lest you should say on the day of resurrection: Surely we were heedless of this. 

[Yusuf Ali 7:172]: When thy Lord drew forth from the Children of Adam― from their loins― their descendants, and made them testify concerning themselves, (saying): "Am I not your Lord (who cherishes and sustains you)?"― They said: "Yea! we do testify!" (This), lest ye should say on the Day of Judgment: "of this we were never mindful." (172)

Tafseer al-burhaan , Vol 2, pg 47 - 

Hazrat Jabar narrates from Imam Muhammed Baqir (as) -he (Jabar asked)-

When was Amir al mumineen called Amir al momineen? He replied:

"That Allah made him as referred in this Ayat a compact which was made with the children of Adam that Allah is their Lord and Muhammed their Prophet and Ali the Amir al- momineen."


Ayat 2

مَن جَآءَ بِٱلۡحَسَنَةِ فَلَهُ ۥ خَيۡرٌ۬ مِّنۡہَا وَهُم مِّن فَزَعٍ۬ يَوۡمَٮِٕذٍ ءَامِنُونَ (٨٩

[Picthal 27:89]: Whoso bringeth a good deed will have better than its worth; and such are safe from fear that Day. (89)

[Shakir 27:89]: Whoever brings good, he shall have better than it; and they shall be secure from terror on 
the day. 

[Yusuf Ali 27:89]: If any do good, will (accrue) to them therefrom; and they will be secure from terror that Day. (89)

"The word Al-hasana (حَسَنَةِ)refers to the Wilayat of Mola Ali" stated in:  
  • Al-kafi -Vol 1, pg, 262, Pub Iran. 
  • Tafseer As-saafi, Vol 2, pg, 250, Pub Iran 
  • Tafseer-e-farraat, pg 115, Pub Iran 
  • Tafseer al-burhaan, Vol, 3, pg 212 
  • Hadeeqa tusShia'h, pg 123 
  • Tafseer-e-Luamah Tanzeel, Vol, 16, pg 97 
  • Kafahat-al-Mohhedeen, Vol 2, pg 661
Ayat 3

وَإِذۡ أَخَذَ ٱللَّهُ مِيثَـٰقَ ٱلنَّبِيِّـۧنَ لَمَآ ءَاتَيۡتُڪُم مِّن ڪِتَـٰبٍ۬ وَحِكۡمَةٍ۬ ثُمَّ جَآءَڪُمۡ رَسُولٌ۬ مُّصَدِّقٌ۬ لِّمَا مَعَكُمۡ لَتُؤۡمِنُنَّ بِهِۦ وَلَتَنصُرُنَّهُ ۥ‌ۚ قَالَ ءَأَقۡرَرۡتُمۡ وَأَخَذۡتُمۡ عَلَىٰ ذَٲلِكُمۡ إِصۡرِى‌ۖ قَالُوٓاْ أَقۡرَرۡنَا‌ۚ قَالَ فَٱشۡہَدُواْ وَأَنَا۟ مَعَكُم مِّنَ ٱلشَّـٰهِدِينَ

[Picthal 3:81]: When Allah made (His) covenant with the prophets, (He said): Behold that which I have given you of the Scripture and knowledge. And afterward there will come unto you a messenger, confirming that which ye possess. Ye shall believe in him and ye shall help him. He said: Do ye agree, and will ye take up My burden (which I lay upon you) in this (matter)? They answered: We agree. He said: Then bear ye witness. I will be a witness with you.

[Shakir 3:81]: And when Allah made a covenant through the prophets: Certainly what I have given you of Book and wisdom-- then an apostle comes to you verifying that which is with you, you must believe in him, and you must aid him. He said: Do you affirm and accept My compact in this (matter)? They said: We do affirm. He said: Then bear witness, and I (too) am of the bearers of witness with you. 

[Yusuf Ali 3:81]: Behold! Allah took the covenant of the Prophets saying: "I give you a Book and Wisdom; then comes to you an Messenger, confirming what is with you; do ye believe him and render him help." Allah said: "Do ye agree, and take this My Covenant as binding on you?" They said: "We agree." He said: "Then bear witness and I am with you among the witnesses."
Bisaar-ad-dahrajaat al-Jazahir thaani, pg 93 states:

The covenant of Prophets (مِيثَـٰقَ ٱلنَّبِيِّـۧنَ) was of the Wilayat of Mola Ali. 

Ayat 4



وَٱعۡتَصِمُواْ بِحَبۡلِ ٱللَّهِ جَمِيعً۬ا وَلَا تَفَرَّقُواْ‌ۚ وَٱذۡكُرُواْ نِعۡمَتَ ٱللَّهِ عَلَيۡكُمۡ إِذۡ كُنتُمۡ أَعۡدَآءً۬ فَأَلَّفَ بَيۡنَ قُلُوبِكُمۡ فَأَصۡبَحۡتُم بِنِعۡمَتِهِۦۤ إِخۡوَٲنً۬ا وَكُنتُمۡ عَلَىٰ شَفَا حُفۡرَةٍ۬ مِّنَ ٱلنَّارِ فَأَنقَذَكُم مِّنۡہَا‌ۗ كَذَٲلِكَ يُبَيِّنُ ٱللَّهُ لَكُمۡ ءَايَـٰتِهِۦ لَعَلَّكُمۡ تَہۡتَدُونَ



[Picthal 3:103]: And hold fast, all of you together, to the cable of Allah, and do not separate. And remember Allah's favour unto you: how ye were enemies and He made friendship between your hearts so that ye became as brothers by His grace; and (how) ye were upon the brink of an abyss of fire, and He did save you from it. Thus Allah maketh clear His revelations unto you, that haply ye may be guided,



[Shakir 3:103]: And hold fast by the covenant of Allah all together and be not disunited, and remember the favor of Allah on you when you were enemies, then He united your hearts so by His favor you became brethren; and you were on the brink of a pit of fire, then He saved you from it, thus does Allah make clear to you His communications that you may follow the right way.


[Yusuf Ali 3:103]: And hold fast, all together by the rope which Allah (stretches out for you), and be not divided among yourselves; and remember with gratitude Allah's favour on you; for ye were enemies and He joined your hearts in love so that by His Grace, ye became brethren; and ye were on the brink of the pit of fire, and He saved you from it. Thus doth Allah make his signs clear to you: that ye may be guided.

Haqul Yaqeen, Vol, 1, pg 149, Allama Shabbar Kazemi Sawareka Mohraka, pg 151, Tafseer al-kabeer, pg 173, Pub Egypt state clearly:

"Rope/Covenant/cable of Allah (بِحَبۡلِ ٱللَّهِ) means holding tightly to the Wilaya of Imam Ali (as).

Ayat 5

عَمَّ يَتَسَآءَلُونَ (١) عَنِ ٱلنَّبَإِ ٱلۡعَظِيمِ (٢) ٱلَّذِى هُمۡ فِيهِ مُخۡتَلِفُونَ (٣) كَلَّا سَيَعۡلَمُونَ (٤) ثُمَّ كَلَّا سَيَعۡلَمُونَ (٥)

[Picthal 78:1-5]: Whereof do they question one another? (1) (It is) of the awful tidings, (2) Concerning which they are in disagreement. (3) Nay, but they will come to know! (4) Nay, again, but they will come to know! (5)

[Shakir 78:1-5]: Of what do they ask one another? (2) About the great event, (3) About which they differ? (4) Nay! they shall soon come to know (5) Nay! Nay! they shall soon know.

[Yusuf Ali 78:1-5]: Concerning what are they disputing? (1) Concerning the Great News, (2) About which they cannot agree. (3) Verily, they shall soon (come to) know! (4) Verily, verily they shall soon (come to) know! (5)

Haqul Yaqeen, Allama Shabbar Kazemi, Vol 1, pg 164 and, Vol 2, pg 74 state:

Niba Azeem (ٱلنَّبَإِ ٱلۡعَظِيمِ) refers to the Wilayat of Imam Ali (as), meaning the great news/event. 

Ayat 6

فَلَمَّا فَصَلَ طَالُوتُ بِٱلۡجُنُودِ قَالَ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ مُبۡتَلِيڪُم بِنَهَرٍ۬ فَمَن شَرِبَ مِنۡهُ فَلَيۡسَ مِنِّى وَمَن لَّمۡ يَطۡعَمۡهُ فَإِنَّهُ ۥ مِنِّىٓ إِلَّا مَنِ ٱغۡتَرَفَ غُرۡفَةَۢ بِيَدِهِۦ‌ۚ فَشَرِبُواْ مِنۡهُ إِلَّا قَلِيلاً۬ مِّنۡهُمۡ‌ۚ فَلَمَّا جَاوَزَهُ ۥ هُوَ وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ مَعَهُ ۥ قَالُواْ لَا طَاقَةَ لَنَا ٱلۡيَوۡمَ بِجَالُوتَ وَجُنُودِهِۦ‌ۚ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ يَظُنُّونَ أَنَّهُم مُّلَـٰقُواْ ٱللَّهِ ڪَم مِّن فِئَةٍ۬ قَلِيلَةٍ غَلَبَتۡ فِئَةً۬ ڪَثِيرَةَۢ بِإِذۡنِ ٱللَّهِ‌ۗ وَٱللَّهُ مَعَ ٱلصَّـٰبِرِينَ (٢٤٩)

[Picthal 2:249]: And when Saul set out with the army, he said: Lo! Allah will try you by (the ordeal of) a river. Whosoever therefore drinketh thereof he is not of me, and whosoever tasteth it not he is of me, save him who taketh (thereof) in the hollow of his hand. But they drank thereof, all save a few of them. And after he had crossed (the river), he and those who believed with him, they said: We have no power this day against Goliath and his hosts. But those who knew that they would meet Allah exclaimed: How many a little company hath overcome a mighty host by Allah's leave! Allah is with the steadfast. 

[Shakir 2:249]: So when Talut departed with the forces, he said: Surely Allah will try you with a river; whoever then drinks from it, he is not of me, and whoever does not taste of it, he is surely of me, except he who takes with his hand as much of it as fills the hand; but with the exception of a few of them they drank from it. So when he had crossed it, he and those who believed with him, they said: We have today no power against Jalut and his forces. Those who were sure that they would meet their Lord said: How often has a small party vanquished a numerous host by Allah's permission, and Allah is with the patient.

[Yusuf Ali 2:249]: When Talut set forth with the armies, he said: "Allah will test you at the stream: if any drinks of its water, He goes not with my army: Only those who taste not of it go with me: A mere sip out of the hand is excused." but they all drank of it, except a few. When they crossed the river,- He and the faithful ones with him,- they said: "This day We cannot cope with Goliath and his forces." but those who were convinced that they must meet Allah, said: "How oft, by Allah's will, Hath a small force vanquished a big one? Allah is with those who steadfastly persevere."

Tafseer-e-Firraat, pg 4, Pub Iran states:

The word Nayharr (نَهَرٍ۬) refers to the Wilayat of Mola Ali as the children of Israel were tested in regarding to Mola.